Were the suffragettes terrorists? By today's definitions? Using violence & disruptive action to achieve goals

Question

We would probably mostly agree that the outcome of the Suffragette movement was a positive one. It acted as a catalyst and springboard for the Feminist movement, leading to the (partial, still incomplete) emancipation of women, and is leading to a society where women have equality of opportunity with men. (Although I realise that this is not the case globally, but progress is being made).

However, would we consider the suffragette movement to be a terrorist organisation?

If Yes, does this mean that we accept that the means can justify the ends?

If No, does this mean that we only define terrorists as people whose goals we disagree with, and call those whose goals we agree with as 'freedom fighters' or something similar?

Does the way we answer this question affect the way we define terrorism?

Serious Thoughts please.

Answer 1

I think in the literal sense, yes, their property destruction (which was their form of violence) could have been a form of terrorism, in that it was unlawful acts done to try to coerce government/society.

However, by today's standards, I think people tend to think of terrorism more as actions causing loss of life.

I think labeling someone as a terrorist also tends to center around whether we consider their actions to be offensive or defensive. (Of course, today's terrorists, especially the radical Muslims, would say they are defensive actions against their enemies.)

Answer 2

Munich is really a city located at the lake Isar in the south of Bavaria. It's a popular city for its lovely structure, fine lifestyle, and the annual Oktoberfest alcohol celebration so if you wish to visit it then this is the place to start hotelbye . Many travellers to Munich are definitely stunned by the caliber of the architecture. Though it was greatly damaged by allied bombing throughout World War II, a lot of their historical structures have already been rebuilt and the town center appears mostly because it did in the late 1800s including: its biggest church, the Frauenkirche, and the famous city hall Neues Rathaus. One of the areas you must see in Munich is Marienplatz. This place has been Munich's key square because the city's foundation and till 1807 and was where areas were held, along with the unexpected old jousting tournament. Furthermore, here you will see: the significant New Town Hall, the regal Old City Hall, the Virgin's Column and the Fish Fountain.

Answer 3

In todays modern term, yes the Suffragettes were terrorists, and their organisation was a terrorist one.
They would throw stones through Parliament windows and commit arson. They campaigned relentlessly, inspiring others to join the cause.
Yes I believe that at the time the means defiantly justified the end.
with out their terror antics the country would be a much worse place.

Yes it does question what the word terrorist means because it's connotations are used to describe something evil, yet really the majority of terrorist are freedom fighters, like Myanmars Monks

Answer 4

The word 'Suffragette' was first coined in1906 by the "London Daily News" and was use to denote the differences between 'Suffragists' and Their more radical sisters. The 'rage' found in the new word might well have had an effect on the population. When The Suffragettes set fire to parts of London, including an arson attempt upon Saint Paul's Cathedral 18 men lost Their lives fighting these blazes. Some say that it was this type of 'terror tactic' which first convinced some British Parliamentarians to advocate the granting of the vote.
I have no doubt that far more lives have been taken by 'Green' and 'Eco' terrorism methods. Be that as it may, I think that it is a safe call to say that the gratuitous destruction of property and the ancilliary taking of human life is considered by most people to be acts of terrorism.

Answer 5

If you intend to learn all the techniques behind the artwork of seduce a female then that https://tr.im/ErxMf can be your book.
The Tao of Badass is a distinctive and unique eBook that includes the essential and practical methods to get the woman you need, getting recognized by the women and or maybe more women wondering you out for a date.
To put things up, you'll receive an absolutely detail by detail classification of the term badass that's greatly utilized in the book – ‘badass '.
Joshua Pellicer brakes down the word ‘badass'in to 25 crucial parts so that you know exactly how to be ‘that guy'who gets all the ladies he desires.
Understanding ‘why you get it done' is required for putting your trust in the new methods you learn.
Tao of Badass will allow you to get entirely thrilled going to the clubs and start placing your new skills to practice!

Answer 6

The suffragettes who fought for change vs anti change campaigned for only 21 years, yes, there were numerous grand buildings destroyed and havoc raised but I in no way can compare this to; The 6 day war, Hagan-nah, Bombing of King David Hotel, Munich Olympics, Palestine Liberation Order and Organization, Afghanistan, Manichean Begin, and go on and on and less we not forget 9-11, in the sum of things there were thousands upon thousands killed by the mere formation of these organization, where death was a positive thing. So you must also think the move on Integration was a terrorist act also? The Pilgrims crossing the prairies?

Answer 7

Terrorists?!? No. These ladies weren't driving covered wagons full of explosives into office buildings.

As for methodology... every civil rights movement has its militant sect and its pacifist sect. The militants get people's attention that a change is needed. The pacifists work with the oppressors to make the changes. Both sects are needed.

That said, I'm guessing that many (most?) men were extremely terrified of the political and social outcomes if women could vote.

Answer 8

Terrorism implies trying affecting change through terror, and I don't think that Suffragettes actually put anyone in fear of their lives. It was more a case of being prepared to die for their cause than kill for it. Your definition would put Gandhi in the terrorist camp. Mostly Suffragettes demonstrated, killed themselves and went on hunger strike. Not exactly terrorism.

Answer 9

Yes... they laid plans to assasinate the Prime Minister of England, they left bombs in buildings, they send death threats to various other people (this was still happening in the 70s & 80s), so yeah - for sure they were terrorists.

Today, they're simply emotional terrorists.


ETA: Why are some of the people who identify themselves as feminist, not know the history of feminism? Do they really 'believe' that feminists did not use terrorism to highlight their cause - or are they just in denial of it (i.e. lying)?

Answer 10

LOL man.. the suffragettes actually committed a lot of arson in the name of their cause.