English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

So killing an unborn infant in more humane than killing an animal to eat?

That logic seems a little faulty?

2007-10-11 19:07:23 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

9 answers

Fuzzy thinking, liberals are notorious for it. I bet PETA wouldn't even protest if you were to use the skins from these tiny babies to make something out of but wear a mink coat and all hell will break lose.

2007-10-11 19:11:57 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4 2

I first chanced on that PETA existed final year. a good chum of mine had stickers against the fur commerce and that i asked her the place she have been given them from.. she mentioned PETA That night I went on PETA and from what they the place asserting they gave the impact of somebody who genially cared approximately animals. Then somebody suggested what Ingrid had finished previous to working at PETA. i replaced into bowled over that somebody who needs the suited for animals might desire to kill canines along with her very own bare palms. Then i found out with regards to the freezers PETA purchase to maintain lifeless canines in, then the reality that they kill greater guard animals than locate new residences. WOW They do care plenty approximately animals Then the entire "no animal might desire to be stored as a puppy" additionally the reality they describe the kennel club because of the fact the KKK! (Now it particularly is merely unwell!) The greater i found out approximately them, the greater disgusted I grew to alter into. they do no longer care approximately animals one bit, all they care approximately is that we'd desire to continually no longer very own them! To them a lifeless canines is greater valuable than a canines owned by utilising a loving human. to answer your question.. NO human beings don't comprehend what they're helping. i'm confident in the event that they did *maximum* human beings might cancel their club. PETA DISGUST ME!

2016-11-08 02:05:14 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I think you have it confused. Having freedom of choice is not the same thing as supporting abortion.
I support freedom so I support a woman's right to choose.
At the same time you don't have to support abortion to support woman's rights.
There are many things in this country that we don't like but that don't give us the right to choose for others. We have free speech (so far) and I don't like every ones opinion but they have the right to speak out.

2007-10-11 19:19:06 · answer #3 · answered by letfreedomring 6 · 1 2

PETA feels animals are more valuable than humans some of them are some of the most radical fringe element types there are. Honestly they want to ban owning of pets. I wish I had my dogs life all she does is sleep all day, play around a while, take a few walks, and beg for food if you ask me that is a pretty damn sweet life. However I must admit I'm pro-choice even though I don't necessary think much of abortion. It is simply more logical to have legal abortions rather than illegal back alley type abortions.

2007-10-11 19:13:45 · answer #4 · answered by UriK 5 · 2 4

killing unborn infant is not equal to abortion. people are going to argue the crap outta you with that point. i don't know if you're trying to get a rise out of people or what but that is just wrong. Anyways, the two are totally unrelated, and the rationales behind the two are totally different.

2007-10-11 19:16:25 · answer #5 · answered by Branshaw 4 · 0 3

No one supports abortion. Many support a woman's right to choose.

2007-10-12 07:22:10 · answer #6 · answered by Hillary 6 · 0 1

Selective compassion! Sick trend among the liberals! I am an animal and embryo lover and I am conservative so there ya go! Once again its a liberal brain malfunction!

2007-10-11 19:30:43 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

excuse me??????

1. abortions do not kill INFANTS.
2. PETA is against animal ABUSE.

Gee, why don't you color it a bit - it needs a little more drama.

2007-10-11 19:17:02 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

Just because someone loves Animals- doesn't mean they love People... (afterall, hasn't the REVERSE been true for Centuries?).

2007-10-11 19:16:58 · answer #9 · answered by Joseph, II 7 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers