This question is regarding a story I read on YAHOO. Here's the link: http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20071011/ennew_afp/entertainmentindialiteraturepottercourtreligion_071011142707
Does Rawling have the right to sue, or have her and her publisher went to far?
2007-10-11 18:49:09 · 4 answers · asked by techieforeva 2 in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
No. She does not have the right to sue. Her word description of that fictitious castle is exactly that. Merely a word description. Some film makers may have created a real structure based on that word description. But, she is not the "creator" of the castle replica being built in India.
2007-10-11 19:47:36 · answer #1 · answered by desertviking_00 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes, she has the right to sue. If they were building a replica of the Disney Castle, or even Yankees Stadium, they are recreating an structure protected by copyright.
2007-10-11 19:12:28 · answer #2 · answered by A Plague on your houses 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Decode this lyrics " If you don't know me by now"
Exodus 31.1-5
It's quite embarassing in letting the whole world know who's been climbing up the coconut trees and still look green.
When they don't even know how to answer a piece of question with those "Three little words" on "Who are you" in kicking the butts of God?
Luke 21.30
What do you think?
2007-10-11 20:58:51 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes
2007-10-11 19:17:02 · answer #4 · answered by brainstorm 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋