English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Especially the thousands that bush said Saddam Hussein possessed in Iraq.

2007-10-11 18:23:08 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

5 answers

Ah thin it cathes wild hawgs...the "nook" the the rope dat grabs em by the neck and the "yooler" is a springy branch dat shoots em up inta air...and the whole thing is just noookyooler ta watch...explosive joyus pandamondium...dang near biblical ta watch...gimme anoder beer darlin if yer gowan ta the kishen...an put a termata in it this time...not that dam juice....ya a whole termata...and leave da skin on dis time dam it.

2007-10-11 18:36:15 · answer #1 · answered by Ford Prefect 7 · 1 0

please impress me learn to spell... thank you i believe the word you were searching for is "nuclear"... have a nice day!
in answer to your question weapons of mass destruction do not have to be nuclear to to be classified in the same contexts as weapons that will kill in large number chemical weapons will do the same.
and as for a.b.l i never heard our president say that anybody had those kind of weapons except for Hussein... please get a grip and stories straight thank you and once again have a nice day!

2007-10-12 01:51:12 · answer #2 · answered by no one here gets out alive 6 · 0 0

Clinton also spoke with a southern accent . I believe he pronounced it nukelayer.

2007-10-12 01:27:13 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

LMAO "nookyooler weapon"

2007-10-12 01:37:15 · answer #4 · answered by nflhandicapper 5 · 1 0

You really have full blown BDS. LOL!

2007-10-12 01:29:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers