Neither. United States is the biggest threat to
the United States, why because as long as they
keep bullying other countries and making up their
own rules as to what countries should do then one
day a bigger and meaner country is going to attack
us. and how do I know as an ex-military man who
served for 22yrs to defend the U.S. I experienced
many things that told me so.
2007-10-11 21:13:15
·
answer #1
·
answered by RudiA 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Russia's inhabitants will decline via 5 million via 2050, it extremely is plenty for the reason that populations are to enhance if a rustic seeks prosperity and needs to guard the elderly. Demographics account for the autumn of the Inca Empire and the Roman Empire. Nuclear weapons do not do something in society, different than outfitted a probability. it is totally almost impossible (if not impossible) for a rustic to realize nuclear superiority. international locations like Iran, that are actually not rational, do not abide via the comparable concepts as russia. Radical Islamic international locations do not care as plenty approximately surviving as antagonistic to extra rational actors. Russia has by no skill gained a important conflict without allied help. they have in common terms prolonged into in particular jap Asia and saved theses territories effectively. those have been in particular weaker international locations or territories that weren't tremendously occupied. Russia, aside from their nuclear applications, coach no extensive probability to the US. China, on the different hand, has secure inhabitants growth and that they have got the numbers to create a great military...it extremely is a few thing Russia possibly by no skill had.
2016-10-06 13:12:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Currently, Iran since they are outside of the international community and a threat to Europe, Japan, and China's oil supplies. Oil is our Achilles’ heel and a sudden lack of supply could launch a world depression and probably a new world war as countries scramble to secure oil for their own markets and militaries.
North Korea will never be more then an irritant.
China currently is not much of a threat other then it has nuclear weapons and probably the means to deliver them to US shores. However, Russia is an unknown that could well take advantage of any war with the USA and China by asserting control of the areas of China that it claims plus China appears to be on the verge of an economic collapse. If it keeps up its economy for a while, its massive military modernization program will make it a threat and the reason the USA still needs to keep ahead of the pack technologically with new fighters, etc. In addition, India appears poised to replace the USA as the number two economy in the world (actually, as the EU continues its decline, the USA will move to number one again, India #2, China #3, and the EU settling in at #4) and China will be wary of them since they too claim parts of China as their own. China's economy is also tied strongly the the USA. They really have too many problems to seriously challange the USA via open warfare.
2007-10-11 19:25:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by Caninelegion 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
Since N. Korea is apparently dismantling its nuclear facilities, the answer would be Iran. Though apparently NK tried to sell nuclear materials to Syria, only to have those materials destroyed in an Israeli raid. If Syria, or any other terrorist nation, got a hold of those materials, then that would put them on the top of the list again.
China has too big a trading relationship with the US. Their economy is built on that trade, and they wouldn't risk it without serious provocation.
2007-10-11 19:16:54
·
answer #4
·
answered by A Plague on your houses 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
China just want to make money and to be one if not the regional power in Asia, this can cause clashes of interest with us the US, but they are not a treat,
..now Iran and North Korea on the other hand are! specially since it seems that they, together with the Syrians are working in conjunction to develop long range missiles capable of deploying nuke warheads..and THAT is a treat in "anyone book"...!
more on this:
http://www.spacewar.com/reports/Iran_And_Syria_Sign_Defense_Agreement.html
http://www.nti.org/e_research/profiles/Syria/Missile/index.html
http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/syria/nuke.htm
-------
2007-10-11 18:35:46
·
answer #5
·
answered by Krytox1a 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
We looked into the pool for our enemy and whom did we see, we saw ourselves. (me)
Israel will take care of Iran and our diplomatic relations will take care of China and North Korea, they don't want war, they need help. Their people are eating grass to keep alive.
I believe we must return to that "Isolationist" state that we were once in. Leave Europe to Europe, and Asia to Asia. We can go in later and pick up the pieces.
No one wants us in their countries unless they need help with hurricanes, tsunamis Earthquakes and other natural disasters. Of course we don't dare ask the world community for aide from any of them, we'd get snubbed.
England did give us some aide during "Katrina" and France did help us in 1803 with England and her Navy. I almost forgot, Mexico did offer it's water treatment plants for "Katrina" the ones we gave them.
We should look to ourselves for ourselves and let the world go be. Let them find another to spit on, call names to and scream epitaphs at.
2007-10-11 23:41:14
·
answer #6
·
answered by cowboydoc 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not only US.
The world.
Decode this lyrics " Shattered Dreams"
Judas over a one man's own great dreams as " King of the Jew" with crown of thorns and two empty hands among one of the dirty dozen getting kick on the butts as casualty of the dead Mummy in not worshiping God.
Luke 9.25
What do you think?
2007-10-11 21:22:42
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
here in dubai what's usually on the headlines is that USA wanted to contain IRAN over its nuclear power ambitions.
obviously the US needs to eradicate perceived or would be rivals in any other continent.
it doesn't really matter where but superiority is what matters most.it is a political & power issue.
2007-10-11 18:49:19
·
answer #8
·
answered by denden 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
none of them really. China is the only one with significant capability to attack the USA
2007-10-11 19:20:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by brainstorm 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
America herself
2007-10-11 18:24:27
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋