English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Abortion rights
yes
no
Stem-cell research
yes
no
Gay marriage
yes
no

2007-10-11 17:19:29 · 16 answers · asked by Anais 4 in Politics & Government Elections

16 answers

No.
No.
No.

That's WHY I vote the way I do in the first place- because I value human rights and science instead of religious bigotry. Why would I vote for someone who is immoral and lacks the common sense to feel the same way??

2007-10-11 20:07:23 · answer #1 · answered by Elizabeth J 5 · 0 1

Abortion Rights - Yes
Stem Cell Research - Yes
Gay Marriage - Yes

Why would I vote for a candidate who's views differ from mine? Isn't that the point of the people's voice?

2007-10-12 20:35:06 · answer #2 · answered by Helen Scott 7 · 0 0

There is no possible way that someone could represent the views of every single American citizen. The only important issue is that they actually follow the Constitution in a lawful manner. That's the important issue. The candidate that actually does that should get the votes.

2007-10-11 21:53:32 · answer #3 · answered by Flying Fish Nugget 3 · 0 0

I always have since no candidate has ever shared all my views. In 2004 I voted for Bush yet I disagree with him on abortion and stem-cell research.

2007-10-11 17:28:09 · answer #4 · answered by scarlettt_ohara 6 · 3 0

many times, what's the suited for the common voter is likewise the suited for the rustic. intense employment, a balanced funds, peace, decrease priced training, etc. the greater valuable off each and every human beings is economically, the greater valuable the entire u . s . is. are not the voters the rustic? How can the two be separated? Why might human beings vote for a candidate with an schedule which will consequence in them being worse off? unlikely to take place. the element is that wealthy human beings might benefit greater from a Republican schedule and the middle and decrease classes might benefit greater from a Democrat. of course, some experience that commonplace wellness care could be undesirable for the rustic. some experience that too plenty unfastened commerce is undesirable for the rustic. i think of all and sundry is meant to vote as they see in high-quality condition for my area. it particularly is the reason we each and every have a vote.

2016-11-08 01:57:15 · answer #5 · answered by deviny 4 · 0 0

I personally don't care about any of those issues. They don't have any influence on my vote at all. Personally, I like the current abortion laws (for the most part, though I'd like to eliminate all government funding for abortions and pro-abortion organizations such as Planned Parenthood). I support stem cell research provided that it is funded privately. I don't believe it is any of the government's business to be involved in marriage, so I don't think that gay marriage is even an issue (gays should just write up marriage contracts and start calling themselves married, as should straights).

I personally cannot vote for a candidate whose views on the direction in which the size of government should go differ from mine. I support restricting the government to protecting rights and defending the country (though never waging war except for defense). Ideally, I don't think the government should exist at all (as all legitimate functions which it performs can be handled better privately and there is no need for national defense except when you have a government). Obviously, I cannot support a candidate who wants to increase the size of the government (which includes almost all of them, as the Republicans are insincere about cutting government, except for Ron Paul and possibly a few others).

2007-10-11 18:32:28 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

So long as my rights are not violated in a free society like this, I could vote for him if he left abortion up to a woman's right to choose, and put forth a descent plan for our scientist to utilize viable research with stem cell research, and left all gay persons to their own way of life without criticizing what they want.

2007-10-11 17:53:22 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Abortion rights Yes
Stem Cell: They already do it, the money comes from private companies and not your tax dollars is the only difference. Stem cell research has never stopped, nor did the government stop it, they just won't pay for it which is fine by me. Gay marriage: NO

2007-10-11 17:23:15 · answer #8 · answered by redlegman64 3 · 1 1

the problem with the world today is everyone wants exactly what they want, everything has to suit them perfectly, and that includes candidates. there are no perfect candidates. it is unlikely any will ever believe every single thing that you believe -- they are not you. this is not Burger King. you don't always get everything just the way you want it. sometimes you have to select among the options for the best one, not the perfect one.

2007-10-11 18:06:39 · answer #9 · answered by KJC 7 · 0 0

No candidate is perfect. There are some issue that are a make-it.break-it for me (e.g., illegal aliens). For example, I won't vote for any of the Democrats, Rudy or McCain because of their position on amnesty.

Abortion - courts, not the president decides
Stem-cell - not an important issue to me
Gay marriage - courts, not the president decides

2007-10-11 17:29:43 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

fedest.com, questions and answers