grammar check?

Question

Can somebody help me with this one?


For example in America, if there is a company and has a meeting to discuss with, there are people who has a good position like a director, and there are people who doesn't have a good position. Whoever the someone is or tells his/her opinion, the boss or worker treat them equal. They don't undervalue the someone who doesn't have a good position, or don't overvalue the someone who has a good position. It's very interesting in Korea. For example as same situation in Korea, if a person has a good position, then people overvalue that person. Even his opinion is right or wrong, people think it's great. But, if someone who doesn't have a good position, people undervalue him/her. Korean society cannot be equal unless they are not distinguish people.

Answer 1

I reworded a lot of your stuff. Some of the sentences didn't make sense.

In some American companies, a boss will treat an opinion from someone equal regardless of their position in the company. Most bosses won't undervalue the opinion of a lower level employee and won't overvalue the opinion of a higher lever employee. On the other hand, in some Korean companies, it's different and very interesting. If an employee is in a higher position, then the boss will overvalue his opinion regardless of whether it is agreeable or disagreeable. He thinks it's better than the opinion of a lower position employee whose opinion doesn't seem to matter. These Korean companies must start to treat all employees equally so as not to create such a class difference between high and low positions in a company.

Answer 2

Here you go! :-)

In America, if a company holds a meeting to discuss an issue, there are people who have a high-level position like a director, and there are people who have lesser positions. Regardless of who tells his/her opinion, the boss or worker treats them equally. They don't undervalue the person who doesn't have a lesser position, nor do they overvalue the person who has a higher position. It's very different in Korea. For example, in same situation in Korea, if a person has an important position, then people overvalue that person. No matter if his opinion is right or wrong, people think it's great. But, if someone doesn't have a good position, people undervalue him/her. Korean society cannot be equal unless they do not distinguishing people based on job status.

Answer 3

For Example, In america, if a company has a meeting, there are people with high positions, such as director, and there are people who have a low position, such as a regular employee. No matter what position the person holds, the boss reguards their opinions equally. It is quite different in Korea. For example, if the same situation were to happen, the person with the higher position would get their opinion heard, and not the person with the lower position. Even if the person with the higher position's opinion is wrong or stupid, people think its great. Yet they dont value the opinion of the person with the low-level position. Korean society cannot be equal unless they stop classifying their people.

I hope that helped XD.