The Democratic National Committee has told the Florida voters that their delegates will not be welcome to come to the national nomination meeting. If the Florida delegates do show up, the committee will not accept their votes. The DNC is telling the Florida voters "you do not have the right to vote when you want, if you don't vote when we say, your votes won't be counted". Now who is suppressing votes from registered voters?
2007-10-11 14:35:49 · 15 answers · asked by citizenvnfla 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
MenifeeManiac has the correct word when referring to liberal control "OBEY".
2007-10-11 14:56:49 · update #1
The Florida Democratic committee is refusing to adhere to the rules issued by the DNC.
Apparently, once again, Florida is trying to screw up the presidential election for the Democrats.
Florida wants to have the prestige of being one of the first states to have their ballets counted; they ought to chill, and obey their national committee edict.
This is not suppression of votes from registered voters; this is the DNC preventing bedlam from occurring by making an example of Florida, to prevent other states from refusing to adhere to the DNC's rules and regulations.
If Florida obeys the DNC's rules, Florida's delgates' votes shall count.
2007-10-11 14:46:14 · answer #1 · answered by MenifeeManiac 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
that's authentic, yet i detect your berating justified. The republican led Florida Legislature placed our prevalent earlier the Democratic occasion reported they could and the punishment is all the main properly known applicants have pulled out, the DNC won't take a seat our delegates and we are a giggling inventory.. returned! So the place is the liberal denial? i think of that's greater a, Florida won't be able to save on with the regulations and we've been given a punishment surpassed down. Now we don't count sort interior the prevalent. And bill Nelson is a lot from liberal.
2016-12-14 15:04:34 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hey, but who started the madness? Ms. Clinton and her co-parts. Don't throw stones so quick, until you get the whole picture. There are rules, and the only one breaking the rules is Rodham-Clinton. Give credit to those who are following the rules and vote for them instead of this game playing b*tch.
Delegates picked by the governor in Florida, Michigan and anywhere else will still vote for president, and the DNC can do nothing about that.
Rodham seems to think if she loses in the primary, she might have a chance to still win by the default, with a swindle of coercion of the DNC. Not happening. In all get out, I think she wants to take the seat of Howard Dean and to squander the funds taken in by the DNC, she is a greedy poor woman who never had anything. Remember she is a descendant of coal miners and that embarrasses her.
2007-10-11 15:02:53 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Yep, seems silly.
Still, I'd rather vote for a party that squabbles about election dates than a party that starts unnecessary wars, runs the country into a huge deficit, and helps corporations trash the environment.
2007-10-11 14:39:15 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
i think it's one thing to keep a citizen from voting in a national election, and quite another to keep a member from voting in an organizational election. what does one have to do with the other? just because the royal order of water buffalo's says something, what does that have to do with me voting for president? dumb assss
2007-10-11 14:40:28 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Maybe the FBI could check out the Florida rulemakers
2007-10-11 14:44:03 · answer #6 · answered by Treon V 2 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Stop making up non-existant news stories.
And even if it were true... how do you conflate a national committee regulating the dates & times when the vote is taking place with the disenfranchisement of minority voters that took place in 2000? They set up police roadblocks in black neighborhoods for chrissake... Doesnt get more obvious then that.
2007-10-11 14:39:51 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
Why would you care about the votes of socialist communists?
2007-10-15 12:42:52 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Democratic party has officially changed it's name to the Socialist Par;ty. They will take over every facet of your life, and you will like it, comrade. This election thing should be an eye-opener to people, but I'm guessing it won't be. After all, if you can make excuses for rape and bj's in the white house, this is small potatoes.
2007-10-11 14:54:19 · answer #9 · answered by klarf 3 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Are you kidding? The whole country knows, Oops, sorry, I forgot, we have ostrich's here too. Anyhow, its called political blackballing, (kinda like whats happening to Ron Paul). I think it's unconstitutional but, who is going to challenge them?
2007-10-11 14:45:52 · answer #10 · answered by sengineer702 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋