http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=10450
2007-10-11 12:34:53 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
The boys at NAMBLA and the ACLU are a large part of the Democrat base. She was courting votes.
2007-10-11 12:38:19 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 13⤊ 3⤋
Your first respondent 'Mullah' is wrong, NAMBLA is NOT a large part of the Democrat party!!
I have always been a Democrat and have never heard of NAMBLA until about a year ago when it was mentioned here on Y/A!
This group is disgusting and I don't understand how an organized group that supports and parades pedophilia is allowed to exist in the United States!
I will e-mail all of my state's reps. and ask them about this! Mrs. Pelosi too!
This group is conducting sexual acts that are illegal! No doubt about it!
I imagine 99% of the people in the Democrat party think is outrageous!!!!!
2007-10-11 12:51:05 · answer #2 · answered by Kelly B 4 · 8⤊ 0⤋
what's your challenge! Your article leaves plenty wanted in connecting any dots! you at the prompt are not making politicians supply funds back from Boeing who has committed fraud adverse to the authorities on many events! NAMBLA, a attractiveness I loathe, changed into seen because the wallet because the assassin's, were both sentenced to existence imprisonment had none! The ACLU's challenge changed into constitutional, though i do not accept as true with it! Even the Mass ACLU idea it changed into repugnant! attempt reconnecting your dots as they make little experience once you look at WHY the mum and father sued NAMBLA. funds!!! they did not kill all of us, nor did they recommend for all of us to kill all of us. those are the data, no matter if you accept as true with their perspectives or do not! It truly would not be counted, i can furnish you with a listing 2 pages lengthy of Republicans who've sexually molested children!
2016-10-09 01:29:01 · answer #3 · answered by favaron 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Before I answer...let me take a few seconds to tell Condor...you win the liberal..."Oh yea, well what about..(fill in the blank).......award..one in every post!!
AnyHoo....Thank you for pointing this out...though I am no longer outraged or shocked by anything the Dim's do...like another poster earlier....NAMBLA is courting her for votes....although I don't think it takes much courting....I think she enjoys being "in bed" with the pedophiles.
She is just a flagrantly amoral hedonistic loony Lefty who cares nothing about "traditional family values"...
Has that term become antiquated yet...if not...it won't be long
Oh, guys....your argument that she was in the same parade but not the exact group........not really an argument...
if she were in the same company of players who were wearing white robes and pointy hoods....would you say she was not supporting them....I think not...point made!!
2007-10-11 12:59:07 · answer #4 · answered by Lilliput1212 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
She is free to hire illegals to work on her lands, free to run around in a gay parade, free to fly to Syria and make deals.speak with the President of Iraq at will. Sure she can do as she wishes.
I thank God she was refused the long range airplane. Oh speaking of God. She prays Bush votes her way too. How many angles can she manage? Personally, I find her without backbone and a horrible Speaker of the House. Congress mind you, she is not third in line as they said. Ted Stevens President Pro tempore. Propaganda. It's an election season and Halloween. What is she portraying today?
2007-10-11 13:00:12 · answer #5 · answered by Mele Kai 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
To actually march in an area of immorality on her part just goes to show where this country is, by partaking she doesn't care how low she goes to get all votes needed to come to power and institute a 3rd world order in A merica, and guess what, we are there already!Too late to wake up America, what is wrong with the American people?????
2007-10-11 12:59:50 · answer #6 · answered by zuriel 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Wow.This link is to an article that uses a lie for it's headline,to get the wingers all excited about the fact that Nancy Pelosi was in the same parade as Harry Hay,along with thousands of other people.
The article never fulfilled the lying headline's premise,that is ,that she "met" him.It only verified they were in the same parade as one another.
Mouthbreathers and inbreds are the only people to bite on this garbage.
2007-10-11 12:55:04 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
What is the matter, Neocon? Talk about your criminal buddies like Bush Cheney and company, gay senator Graig and other perverted Neocons.
2007-10-12 02:53:38 · answer #8 · answered by Condor 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Nope. She was in the same parade as Harry Hay but not in the group he was with. Read your own link. This is what annoys me about people of your ilk. Not only do you reach back a year to try to substantiate your BS but you can't even get the story correct. Running out of talking points maybe?
2007-10-11 12:56:35 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Nancy is not my favorite politician, I find it difficult to believe she would intentionally promote NAMBLA. Since she is from the bay area I would have to think she believed she was with people who lay claim to alternative lifestyle. In SF that generally means LGBT (lesbian, gay, bi, and transgendered).
2007-10-11 12:47:37 · answer #10 · answered by ggraves1724 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Condor - Too late there brightboy, we are already onto "people" like you:
Liberals! Did I pull this technique off correctly?!?!?
This question was asked:
Would you rather swim with sharks or spend the day with George W. Bush?
I answered:
Why didn’t Clinton do anything about the shark attacks in Florida?!?!?
Did I execute the sidestep correctly?
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AuoiVAPbkN_d_ruHdFOT1Zvty6IX;_ylv=3?qid=20071010153020AA7T68n
You look like a flippin tool.
Keep putting out the word Peanut!!
2007-10-11 12:44:45 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋