In use of force against groups who destroy property, stop traffic, and create disorder for their "causes"?
2007-10-11 10:18:39 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Funny it looks like liberals were the only ones who read and understood the question. Liberal use of force.
2007-10-11 10:34:14 · update #1
The police should not stop citizens from peacefully assembling. It's called the Bill of Rights. If it takes someone a little longer to get to the wine tasting, oh well.
2007-10-11 10:24:27 · answer #1 · answered by Zardoz 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why should they do that? What an asinine thought.
Sometimes when an idea crosses your little pea brain, it isn't always right to put them out there so the whole world can see what a fool you are. You are just embarrassing yourself.
2007-10-11 17:22:46 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you mean stop carrying guns and enforcing laws, I would be able to defend myself in that type of world, but would most Liberals be able to (talk only goes so far against people bent on doing you harm).
2007-10-11 17:22:40 · answer #3 · answered by Yo it's Me 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
maybe where lots of bad peploe are but in most spots no
2007-10-11 17:35:21 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No
'Liberal' as it is defined in the Dictionary is good.
'Liberal' as in MoveOn.org and Castro is bad.
So no.
2007-10-11 17:20:56 · answer #5 · answered by PNAC ~ Penelope 4 · 0⤊ 4⤋
They should use automatic weapons LIBERALLY!
2007-10-11 17:21:04 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋