English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I would beg him to take me back (this was never ever going to happen) I never loved him never liked him. Do not regret my children but deeply regret having them with the moron I did. The children were with me for six years did not see him at all. Now they have been with him and not seen me for ten years. I think any man who takes children out of spite is purely evil and should never ever be forgiven. I would never be in the same room with him ever again. I dont ever want to know what they have done with him or ever hear his name again. I do not drink or smoke and would never ever sleep with any man who smealt like an ashtray or a brewery. I cant stand sport particularly football or rugby I would never stay in any room where it was on and would not let any man watch on my t.v. I have been very happily divorced for 20 years would never ever have a joint bank account or let any man have joint morgage or rent. If they dont like they do not need apply I dont really want one anyway.

2007-10-11 08:55:32 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

15 answers

Jeeeeez you need to get laid...

2007-10-11 10:08:54 · answer #1 · answered by Joe 5 · 0 1

If the amount of pent up anger in your statement is anything to go by, the Courts were right to give custody away.

You obviously have your own views and are strong in getting your own way.

"I think any man who takes children out of spite is purely evil and should never ever be forgiven" are your words. What about you taking the children back to spite your ex?
You are so full of anger and spite that your judgement is clouded.

If you can't even bear to hear what YOUR children have done with him then you're not much of a mother.

Try thinking of the children and keeping your volatile feelings inside.

2007-10-11 16:11:22 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 5 0

OK.

Well, the courts changed the custody agreement because they are bound to look out for the best interests of the children.

If you want them back (they must be at least 16 by now, right?) before they are 18, then the burden will be on you to prove that the best interest now lies with you.

Times change and so do cirucmstances, so in theory it is possible.

In practice, given your rant and bitterness and lack of understanding of the original issue after at least 10 years, I predict you have a long row to hoe in a very short time.

Good luck, but practically speaking, maybe you would have better resutls in the long term if you sought out a counselor with the goal of finding the best way to reconcile with your kids as they reach adulthood.

2007-10-11 16:03:29 · answer #3 · answered by Barry C 7 · 3 0

Don't know which planet you're on but the courts in the UK nearly always favour the mother of the children until they consider the kids old enough to decide who they want to live with. The kids were with you for 6 years and have been with him now for 10. So they are 16 at least and perfectly capable of making up their own mind. So why don't the kids want to live with you? You seem like a complete and utter bore to me.

2007-10-11 17:25:40 · answer #4 · answered by mustardcharlie 3 · 3 0

My question to you is, What does having a drink, smoking, or watching sports have to do with being a good or bad parent? I should think that the kids were placed with their father rather then you, might have something to do with your being delusional. Try to be less self involved and worry more about the children, and just maybe you might be able to have a relationship with them before it's too late. Please seek some help and maybe take some parenting classes to see love and neutering and self-lessness is what makes good parents.

2007-10-13 00:41:31 · answer #5 · answered by Tazzie_Shedevil 2 · 0 1

I think you have just saved a lot of men a problem. Your rant (which violates Community Guidelines) gives everyone an idea of why the children were given to the Father. At least they are saved from hearing your logic. You will be much happier, as will others, being alone.

2007-10-11 16:02:48 · answer #6 · answered by sensible_man 7 · 6 1

Don't think for a moment the courts would have giving custody of the children to your ex on the grounds that they thought it may get you back together .

2007-10-11 16:22:29 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

All of that's your personal business, but what about your kids? I hope some day you'll get to know them. When that time comes, please remember that it's not always all about you. I guess what I'm saying is that it would be nice if you didn't just use the occasion to attack their father. Possibly, he's a worthless sample of human pond scum, but which is more important, getting across that point or allowing your children some shreds of self-respect?

2007-10-11 16:07:18 · answer #8 · answered by Zelda Hunter 7 · 1 1

oh you poor thing i havn't heard of that type on thing happening in our legal system in the UK they tend to if even be a bit over harsh on the men, you must have had a rubish laywer and should have applied for an appeal. Well i don't know your reason for posting on here but i hope you are happy now in your life and ignore all the other loosers on here half the people on yahoo answers have a pole stuck up their back side.

2007-10-11 16:06:32 · answer #9 · answered by ? 6 · 1 4

Riiiiiiiiight Fiona! I hope you wake up from your self induced nightmare soon enough to realize you need some serious help!

2007-10-11 16:02:53 · answer #10 · answered by Chris B 7 · 5 1

At least youve got it off your chest now.Us men are not all bad even if we do like watching football on telly....Are you really happy without a partner ..You dont seem to be even though you say you are ...come on ...cheer up .........

2007-10-11 16:10:10 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers