The list is far too long. But I'd put Hillary and Obama in that category, as well as Giuliani and McCain.
The only candidate running who is not a dishonest salesman is Ron Paul.
2007-10-11 08:55:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by skullklipz 3
·
4⤊
0⤋
Why Barney Frank? (no longer that i do no longer love obscure hatred) Jimmbbo - it rather is frightening to verify which you're a suitable contributor, pondering your dismiss for info. Obama hasn't raised taxes. Your irrational concern only makes you think of he has, or is going to. The stimulus equipment hasn't been given sufficient time to paintings, and the equipment wasn't sufficiently enormous interior the 1st place, a minimum of it wasn't in accordance to pulitzer prize triumphing economist Paul Krugman, who would only have a splash extra credibility in this subject than you. you could't assume the economic gadget to coach around on the spot. Have some persistence. The 7 trillion greenback deficit prediction over the subsequent ten years could be incorrect. the recent projections have it at 9, yet returned, those are only projections. A miscalculation isn't the comparable as a lie, even however, and given the complicated subject rely, miscalculations are straight forward. yet nevertheless, only time will tell what the rather deficit would be for the subsequent ten years. As for the lack of ability of transparency declare, sturdy success proving that one. And putting one obscure notice in citation marks without exhibiting why it rather is appropriate is rarely making a component, yet maximum folk do no longer make factors right here.
2016-12-29 05:08:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by liebro 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
fred thompson.
i don't consider him a phony or dishonest, but he has yet to make statements on where he stands on a lot, if any, issues. And, he is number 2 in the race for the republican primary which i think is just because he's famous from law and order and the only one people know the name other than guilianni. maybe i will change my mind after he gives some proof that he is actually competent enough to hold the position of President.
2007-10-11 08:56:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by roll tide & go pats =) 3
·
3⤊
1⤋
Hillary Clinton.
Hillary Clinton.
Hillary Clinton.
Hillary Clinton.
Hillary Clinton.
Hillary Clinton.
Hillary Clinton.
2007-10-11 08:57:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by ken 6
·
5⤊
1⤋
Rush Limbaugh...
Ok, ok, not technically a politician, but close enough...
Followed closely by Glen Beck and Nancy Grace
2007-10-11 08:58:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
John edwards
2007-10-11 08:57:33
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Hillary and Bill Clinton. NO we do not all agree.
Add Jimmy Carter to that growing list.
Thank you.
yo' Macy Fred Thompson .???
2007-10-11 08:57:58
·
answer #7
·
answered by Mele Kai 6
·
4⤊
1⤋
Either of the Clintons. I think those to have lied opportunistically for so long, they have forgotten how to speak the truth.
2007-10-11 08:59:59
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
GWB, hands downs
2007-10-11 08:54:12
·
answer #9
·
answered by jean 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
thats easy-----bush, cheney, rice, rumsfeld , wolfowitz, pelosi, delay, lott, clinton, kennedy, reid, edwards, craig, richards.........
2007-10-11 08:55:43
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋