.
Ahmedinejad- Iran
Castro- Cuba
Hugo Chavez- Venuzuela
Kim Jong-ill - North Korea
Gaddafi- Libya
Assad - Syria
Morales- Bolivia
Robert Mugabe- Zimbabwe
2007-10-11 07:24:34 · 43 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
Please stop fooling around. George Bush is the person who got rid of Saddam and brought freedom to Iraq. Hes a good christian man with values and I cant say that about the people on the list
2007-10-11 07:32:38 · update #1
Robert Mugabe closely followed by G W Bush.
2007-10-11 07:27:22 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
I can see this has been written by an American of a certain persuasion?
Ahmedinejad : yes, unpredictable and also dangerous
Castro : not dangerous, just deluded, he's not even the proper leader any more as his brother has as good as taken over
Hugo Chavez : as for Castro. Funny how many of his people do actually like him a lot and it seems genuine, seeing him as someone who can solve their problems
Kim Jong-Il : dangerous for his own people but realises I am sure that his country will be wiped off the map should it use the bomb it allegedly has
Gaddafi : has come to realise that supporting terrorism is no longer an option in today's world.
Assad : a mysterious person, who knows? Used to be an eye doctor in London before being summoned back to Syria when his dad died.
Morales : the man of the funny jumpers? How on earth is he dangerous, let alone evil?
Mugabe : a danger for his own people, likewise evil and most definately deluded. Maybe his age is catching up with him?
George Bush is certainly one of the most dangerous and thankfully he only has just over a year left in office. Admittedly it sounds like a broken record but it is always striking how he was responsible for the debacle / disaster / fiasco that Iraq is becoming if it isn't that already. I mean, why the f**k invade a country and make no plans for the aftermath? Look at all the constant and never ending chaos these days!! It was kind of "reassuring", though, to read somewhere that the CIA and State Department had told him not to do it, yet he persisted. At least there are some reasonable Americans in authority.
2007-10-11 08:19:21 · answer #2 · answered by PRH1 3 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Apart from the obvious omission of George Bush Jnr you have left out:-
Khamenei - Iran
Gaddafi - Libya
Olmert - Israel
Putin - Russia
and many more. Pakistan and India? Burma (Myanmar)? Vietnam? China? The Phillipines? Practically all the countries you mention are those opposed to George Bush's ideals . If that is your idea of evil, i.e all that are opposed to me are wicked, then I suggest you take a look at the Christian faith you quote so pompously. Thought the principles had something along the lines of "Thou shalt not kill" and "Love thy neighbour". George Bush has been responsible for far more civilian deaths in his tenure of office than Saddam ever was. I don't think there is any doubt that he is the most dangerous man in the world. Evil? Probably not but then neither was Saddam.
2007-10-11 10:09:32 · answer #3 · answered by mustardcharlie 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that a few people on this list were worse than Saddam.
Regarding you comments about Bush - Well, I'm sure that most of the above are 'religious' and doing what they are in the name of God. As for getting rid of Saddam, he did, but his motives were less than noble (Oil, Daddy's unfinished business) and also look at the mess Iraq is in now. The UN could have controlled Saddam given the chance, with a lot less bloodshed.
2007-10-11 09:50:00 · answer #4 · answered by David 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Kim Jong ill
Robert Mugabe
2007-10-11 07:42:58 · answer #5 · answered by ? 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Robert Mugabe.
..and of course George. w. Bush ~ he might be a christian but he is still more trouble than the rest of the leaders of the world. Especially since he is in control of a powerful country with the economic strength to back things up.
2007-10-11 08:22:51 · answer #6 · answered by Elly 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
ha ha ha...
i have to assume you are american with a list like that AND the implication that Saddam was somehow the most dangerous and evil world leader....
you best check out the real news around the world and stop believing the propaganda... no one is joking when they write gw bush as an answer..
the fact you include morales, castro and chavez on your list is laughable - were they on bush baby's list of baddies last time you checked or something???
2007-10-11 08:56:08 · answer #7 · answered by pooterpet 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Mugabe is without a doubt another like Saddam and the most evil man alive. But Putin, who has already started another cold war with his planes flying into British airspace, is the more dangerous. He is not only aggressive but arrogant with it and wants to be known as the most powerful man on the planet. That's why he is the most dangerous.
2007-10-11 07:38:39 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Decode this lyrics " Say you say me"
The poor old man got hinself kick on the butts by Mr. Big Brother of artificial intelligence in messing up with science and mathematics.
Getting kick on the butts as casualty of the dead Mummy in not worshiping God.
Decode this lyrics " I will follow him"
None in the shopping bag seem to be the dead Mummy risen from the graveyards.
While Humpty Dumpty were sitting high up on the wall.
Decode this lyrics " Shattered dreams"
Look around in the real world.
Who were Judas in making a mockery out of someone else as "King of the Jew" with crown of thorns and two empty hands.
Even kick the butts in messing up the "King and I" while Barnabas were at loss and blurred being short-changed with ghostly stories all over a one man's own dreams as King of the Jew among one of the dirty dozen.
Luke 8.10,17
What do you think?
2007-10-11 18:58:03 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Robert Mugabe
2007-10-11 07:31:08 · answer #10 · answered by Banjo1746 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋