if electricity hadn't invented , how the would be different?

Question

open answer

Answer 1

Ask the Amish. From what I know about the Amish, we would all be wearing funny hats and live a primarily agrarian existence. I suppose there might still be steam power but that could only account for a certain percentage of our technological improvements.

Answer 2

Electricity was not "invented" but learned to be controlled, contain, manipulated. Scientists are still trying to figure out where it comes from. Everything is energy on the subatomic level, and it all boils down ultimately to a unified field of consciousness, or God.

Answer 3

That's one of those hypothetical questions that is impossible to answer and if answered, is purely subjective. Electricity had to be invented, it would be invented no matter what, and has been invented. That's all there is.

Answer 4

If electricity had not been invented, how would we be different?
This world would still be very primitive. There would be no cars as we know them, certainly no aircraft and no Internet with which to Yahoot!

Answer 5

If electribity had not been invented, how would the world be changed?
It was not a giant leap to discover the use of electricity.
If not for the wars it would have happened much sooner.

Answer 6

Hi,we had a time when our electric was cut off.Luckily we still had gas & our brains its amazing the things you think of doing.I read a lot & got that I did not miss electric to iron I heated pans & used them to iron the clothes.

Answer 7

We would have nothing that you can see today.... Absolutely nothing it would be a primitive world so blah and think about it no clothes except for animal hides no cars no hot baths. Just think of the cave men... That's how it would be.... Good luck Grant M in Pennsylvania

Answer 8

The population wouldn't be as big that's for sure, we would have to hunt for food each day to keep it fresh, we wouldn't be able to take a nice hot shower, the world would be A LOT less polluted, I could keep going but I got a date!!

Answer 9

We'd probably go round bumping into each other in the dark.

Answer 10

This is a non-realistic Q now? Real Q is how to make use of it for HUMANKIND?


READ BELOW:

How?
READ FOLLOWING:

Is nuclear deal of India with US is really worth?
It worth down the line of 50 - 60 years.


[A}.-Why worth ?
1) Fossile fuel is limited in INDIA and world.,
2) Nuclear fuel is also limited in INDIA AS WELL AS in world but can give enrgy for some years.


[B]. - Con of Nuclear?
Nuclear power cost is Rs 3.00 per Kwh Where as coal cost Rs 1.40 per Kwh
Like petroleum, Foreign currancy will goout for
1). TECHNOLOGY,
2). FUEL,
3). INSPECTION,
4). EQUIPMENT, ETC
other CONs are:
5) Dependent on other
6) Possible stopage of fuel on later date (like USA stopped for TARAPUR UNITS, canadian STOPPED FOR RAWTBHATA UNITS)
7) Radioactive and toxic WASTE Management,
8) Radiation to workers,
9) Raidation to public, in the event of Nuclear accident,
10) Long construction period and high cost of nuclear power plant.


[C]. - Options for INDIA ?
OPTIONS with little or no foreign currancy OUTGO:
1) WIND mill with limitless energy
2) HYDRAL with limitless life span,
3) SOLAR with limitless life,
4) Municipal waste with limitless life,
5) Agriculture waste WITH LIMITLESS LIFE,
6) COAL,
7) GAS.
OPTION WITH FOREIGN CURRANCY OUTGO:
1) NUCLEAR,
2) PETROLEUM,
3) GAS.


[D] Why 50 - 60 years?
Now INDIA MAY SURVIVE with Coal,Gas, Wind, Solar, Hydral, WASTE, Etc but after 60 years fossile will vanish and WIND, SOLAR, HYDRAL, WASTE cannot give sufficient energy for the INDUSTRY.


[E].- What is the option ?
INDIA SHALL USE NUCLEAR OPTION FOR ENERGY GENERATION..


[F] What is about foreign currency, dependence?
1). SINCE 50 - 60 YEARS is long. INDIA SHALL EXPLORE IT'S 1800 KM by 2000 km land surface, 100 - 2000 km on sea bed to check if Urenium can be extracted economically.
2) USA has formed NSG with 50 countries to deny access to nuclear fuel to countries like NDIA. World has 120 - 150 countries. INDIA can make an extensive search for URANIUM in the remaining POOR countries. It will help that POOR country for their economic upliftment and HELP india to get fuel. But how does it stop the foreigncurrency outgo? Since these poor contries need is limited to " ROOTI-KAPDE-AUR-MOKAN", in which INDIA is strong enough; it can exchagne those goods with NUCLEAR FUEL ( if available). Since these poor countries does not have economical, technological capability, they will welcome help from INDIA. It amounts to free "ROOTI-KAPDE-AUR-MOKAN" for people of those poor country at free of cost due to avialality of URANIUM in their countru ( Which they can not use or do anythings)


[G]. Why this deal ?
If INDIA refused to this proposal, OPTION as in [F] above can not be materialised? Why? Since USA is WORLD DADA, it will influence other ( 125-50 = 75) countries not to allow INDIA for exercising OPTION [F]


[H].- Conclusion ?
INDIAN has no option but to sign the deal.