Because most liberals are democrats, and a good population of the poor are democrats because the democratic party is known to give money to the poor so then they can get a little more power over the people, yes to keep them dependent on the government.
2007-10-11 07:51:38
·
answer #1
·
answered by Jasmine W 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Why do cons always assume that liberals hate?
Liberals don't hate anything except things like racism, pernicious poverty, lack of equality, prejudice in any form and government intrusion into private lives.
Liberals love money as much as anyone else, but they also believe in being both human and humane. Keeping people healthy, educated and trained isn't keeping them dependent.
Throwing them on the street to sink or swim is.
There will always be those who cannot survive on their own, the mentally and physically ill, for instance, infants and children. The elderly. Helping them isn't slavery, its doing what needs to be done if we want to think of ourselves as civilized, otherwise we could just put the newborns on the side of a mountain like the Spartans, or leave the elderly on an ice floe.
Or maybe that's what you are looking for?
2007-10-11 14:02:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by justa 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'm going to second what justagrandma said. I don't hate people who work hard to earn money. But I do hate people who earn their money on the backs, blood, and sweat of those working for them.
Other things liberal hate: the growing gap between the rich and poor and the war on the middle class that has gone on since the early 1980s. Let's face it: There's something wrong when a CEO makes more in one day than many of his employees do in a year.
2007-10-11 14:39:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by VeggieTart -- Let's Go Caps! 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Just the opposite admire successful people as long as they dont aquire their wealth by taking it from others unethically.
Why are you so uninformed about your fellow americans?
2007-10-11 13:56:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
We hate successful people that stole, pillaged, and plundered their way to being wealthy. If someone worked ahrd to get where they are, then we accept.
2007-10-11 14:01:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by NOT as smart as a 5th grader 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
It takes money to make money.
How do you keep people poor by giving them money or by not giving them money?
2007-10-11 14:08:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by Jose R 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
That's a ludicrous assertion. There are plenty of very wealthy liberals in all lines of work and walks of life.
Thanks for playing, though.
2007-10-11 13:54:34
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
you have a point there -now with Hillary and socialize medicine -they will be depend on the liberals more to be dumb down
2007-10-11 13:54:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by seawolf 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
it messes with their platform of " victicrats"
2007-10-11 13:53:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋