Sure makes the right wing look intelligent. He also says the Democrats will increase the deficit but look at what Bush and Reagan did. I do not understand how he can keep pumping out this crap.
2007-10-11 06:43:11 · 31 answers · asked by BC 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Hitler's propagandists convinced millions of otherwise intelligent Germans that it was 'acceptable' to gas six million Jews.
The Republicans' primary propagandist, toxic-waste-breath Limbaugh, will convince otherwise intelligent 'ditto heads' that it's 'acceptable' to injure - or even kill - anyone who doesn't subscribe to Rush's agenda.
And as the ditto heads keep listening in awed admiration, Rush keeps laughing all the way to the bank in shameless disregard for the health, safety and future of America. -RKO- 10/11/07
2007-10-11 06:56:43 · answer #1 · answered by -RKO- 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
There is no evidence of truth to anything the hate spewing bastard says. If Bush would agree that Global warming is a fact, Rush would spew it. He isn't going to agree with any Democratic idea. He hates us. End of story.
2007-10-11 14:01:39 · answer #2 · answered by grumpyoldman 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
What Rush has said is that there is no evidence that the warming of the planet is caused by man. If you have followed Hillary's campaign to date she has promised new spending that will increase the deficit, I suspect he takes her at her word. Your not suggesting she is just telling lies to get votes, are you? As to Bush and Reagan, if the democrates are so concerned with the deficit why don't they vote against spending the money. In both cases the dems run or have ran congress. I don't understand how you just keep pumping out this crap?
2007-10-11 13:51:37 · answer #3 · answered by espreses@sbcglobal.net 6 · 1⤊ 4⤋
He's hilarious, and so are the moron followers of him...
One day he'll say Global Warming doesn't exist....the next he'll say it DOES exist (but it's not man-made).
The fact is Rush is a spin-artist. He has absolutely NO understanding of science, the scientific process, or atmospheric physics. He's a blowhard, chickenhawk liar. Virtually ALL scientists with credibility IN THE WORLD agree that man-made global warming DOES exist...The science behind it is rather simple, if the Rush and the mindless NeoCons would take the time to educate themselves.
2007-10-11 13:48:34 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 1⤋
Republicans have Rush Limbaugh and Larry the Cable Guy making them look stupid, Democrats have Carlos Mencia doing the same thing. No matter which side you're on, only idiots pay attention to these guys.
2007-10-11 13:48:49 · answer #5 · answered by daniel 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
The deficit is coming down.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071011/ap_on_bi_go_ec_fi/budget_deficit
As far as Rush's statement goes in light of how his quotes have been taken out of context.
I like to site your source.
There seems to be growing evidence of that this is natural cycle and not man- made.
Al Gore's movie is not mark up with it's mistake and called a political flim not a documentary.
Now it is found out that Soros bought off the NASA sciencist who was claiming Bush silenced him.
I wish I can spend as much time listening to Rush as liberals do it would be nice.
2007-10-11 14:01:22 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Global warming is a simple measurable fact.
The argument is whether or not man is responsible, and if he should he be forced to clean up after himself or just allow it to be business as usual. And its business of course that is fighting this as that's who is responsible for the amounts of pollutants in the air. Cow stories to the contrary.
In the sense that Rush specialized in hot air he could be said to be a danger to the environment, but he can say what he wants, all I know is that to the people on the beach in NY in October, well, they were laughing AT him, not with him.
2007-10-11 13:54:42 · answer #7 · answered by justa 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
This sort of inane talk is why I quit listening to Rush years ago. I don't think the situation is as bad as the doomsayers (like Gore) indicate, but the evidence is pretty plain that its happening. The real questions are how much are people contributing to it, what are the likely results, and what can be done about it.
2007-10-11 13:50:11 · answer #8 · answered by Lavrenti Beria 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The only thing Limbaugh will be remembered for in 50 years is not believing in global warming. In 50 years there will be documentaries like "How could they not have noticed what was happening" filled to the brim with clips of Limbaugh and his clones lying to hapless chimpanzees who believed him.
2007-10-11 13:46:58 · answer #9 · answered by Earl Grey 5 · 4⤊ 2⤋
somedays I feel like I'm talking over people's heads... when that happens I just go listen to Rush and I get a temporary IQ drop of about 15 points... problem solved.
Edit: to vinsa .... disagreeing with something someone said is NOT limiting free speech... on the contrary it is the very definition OF free speech.
2007-10-11 13:48:49 · answer #10 · answered by pip 7 · 6⤊ 1⤋