no it would never be coz in les than 90 yrs time, the TITANIC WOULD HAVE DISAPPEARED... the pH of the water there is 4 and dissolves the wreckage little by little
2007-10-11 06:19:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by yanesh 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
The Titanic represented failure. It was reputedly "unsinkable" according to its designers and builders. Yet, of course, it sank on its maiden voyage. There was no way Harland and Wolff were ever going to go back to this design. As for ocean liners - they have lost their place in the world. If you want to go from London to New York, you fly in less than 10 hours. A ship would take several days, certainly in the order of a week, and use much more fuel than a flight would. Rebuilding the Titanic would be pointless. The finest liner currently operated by Cunard (in fact the only one) is the RMS Queen Mary 2. Her home port is Southampton. She first sailed in 2004.
2016-04-08 03:16:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It being consumed by the sea. It's very fragile now and probably cannot stand much bumping. The depth is pretty extreme for a tourist submarine. But, the Russians are letting tourists on the space station so if you have enough money, I suppose anything is possible.
2007-10-11 08:16:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by tom 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
Of course it will be with such technological progress we have right now - it will be in next 10 years i think. But sending tourists into space is more reliable project for me.
2007-10-12 01:48:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by Damon_ru 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
It's probably safer to say that it will happen then it won't happen. If the technology gets to the point where they can bring people down to the wreckage safely and quickly and someone can figure how to make a profit...i would say that it would probably happen. I would like to see the Titanic.
2007-10-11 06:10:22
·
answer #5
·
answered by nightcricket 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
Anything is possible. The only question is if by the time someone figures out how to make it affordable to a large number of people, the ship may be completely consumed by the Atlantic.
2007-10-11 06:12:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by BillyBob1974 1
·
2⤊
2⤋
I don't think if it really is a question of whether it can or not. I suspect that if there were truly a desire for this sort of tourism, the technology would be developed (that is if it doesn't already). It would, no doubt be exceedingly expensive, and in somewhat poor taste, perhaps, but possible.
2007-10-11 06:10:25
·
answer #7
·
answered by swigaro 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
it's already tourist attraction in that you can book a seat..an expensive seat.........on a mini sub to go down in summertime dives......but as was mentioned, she is not so slowly disintegrating........the difference just in the 15 years since Ballard found her is noticeable,,,and she wont be there much longer.....and one good bump from a sub could do incalculable damage......
2007-10-11 09:17:31
·
answer #8
·
answered by yankee_sailor 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
I will just say it could. But, we better hurry. ;-)
Watch the video link.
http://video.yahoo.com/video/play?vid=709408&cache=1
2007-10-11 09:49:41
·
answer #9
·
answered by Snaglefritz 7
·
1⤊
1⤋