2007-10-11 05:33:13 · 17 answers · asked by captain_koyk 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I hope it becomes an honest debate about the issues, and not a overheated debate of nonsense propaganda.
2007-10-11 05:37:08 · answer #1 · answered by Steve C 7 · 5⤊ 0⤋
Well just for the record not ALL Conservatives are against abortions. Only the real religious ones are
Herb: Just like every Lib will vote for Hillary even though she has all ready said that she would not do most of the things they want.
Its the lesser of 2 Evils vote , why would you think that a Religious Conservative would vote for Hillary? They might not vote at all but if they did it certainly would be for Rudy
2007-10-11 05:36:21 · answer #2 · answered by TyranusXX 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No. James Dobson has threatened to back a third-party candidate if a pro-choice Republican wins the nomination. I'm sure there are plenty of religious right Republicans who would be angry enough to split the party for a candidate whose values match theirs. Maybe then the sensible Republicans can take their party back from the theocrats and we can mitigate all the partisan bickering between the parties.
pssst...I'm a Democrat.
2007-10-11 08:11:05 · answer #3 · answered by VeggieTart -- Let's Go Caps! 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it truly is all about attitudes of the middle. we stay in a international the position it truly is perfect to scoff at God without understanding the reality of His note and finally, His Judgments. the position human beings scream and rant about 'rights' and the immoral taking a existence the position their existence are opposite to God, for it truly is the effortless thread of the wonderful days. living for self without idea-about the author because those attitudes cramp their form of living. pretend beliefs domesticate and motivate those attitudes and many take in those self same attitudes and ideology at the same time as searching to their destiny. Saving the planet is more desirable major that saving a existence.professional-lifers trust that it truly is a lady's top to dedicate homicide contained in the call of self-information.That it truly is their body and nobody has the authority to inform them what to do.yet they too ought to face earlier their Maker and provides you an account of their existence and God perspectives the homicide of innocents, heavily. To play with hearth now's a foretaste of your destiny, until eventually you repent. This planet will bypass away yet existence is infinitely more desirable worthwhile. A God-given top that folk don't understand because they fail to furnish credence to the Maker of all. That too, is an ethical outrage and one which isn't hidden after we stand earlier God and provides you an account of our existence. each and every thing hidden and finished in darkness will be delivered out into the mild. God Bless, as we rejoice the reason behind the season.
2016-10-09 00:56:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The key in next year's election is KEEP YOUR EYES ON THE PRIZE. Between Rudy and Hillarious, even given the abortion issue, which would you rather have in the White House?
2007-10-11 05:44:57 · answer #5 · answered by Mike 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Nope
Free Speech will still be intact if Rudy is elected.
Moral outrage won't stop because of who is in the White House.
2007-10-11 05:36:31 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Its already getting silent. I heard Hannity try to make a distinction between abortion and the evils of partial birth abortion on his radio show a month or so ago. He said that Giuliani's stance on abortion was ok, and that Hillary was absolute evil because she supported partial birth abortion.
To me, abortion is abortion: the ending of life. There is no distinction between the two.
2007-10-11 05:41:44 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I doubt it. And many conservatives are not going to be concerned about Guilliani's own views about abortion as they are going to be concerned about what kind of appointees to the Supreme Court Guilliani will make. And he knows that, which is why he has been using the rhetoric of "strict constructionist" judges.
2007-10-11 05:47:38 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He's a person with strong leadership qualities that has antiquated ideals about patriotism. He will get the conservative vote with his warmongering attitude.
2007-10-11 05:46:01 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I guess I weird - a pro-choice, anti illegal immigration conservative.
Time for middle of the road and the Democrats are not providing it.
2007-10-11 05:45:02 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋