All together now : "I don't care too much for money , money can't buy me love"
2007-10-11 05:26:50 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Family & Relationships ➔ Marriage & Divorce
Nope. And she wouldn't have had his baby either
2007-10-11 05:30:57 · answer #1 · answered by David C 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I doubt it!
Otherwise this divorce would have been sorted out long ago and we wouldn't be hearing all this publicity or ugly fights going on for money!
How ugly is that!
I believe obviously that when you married and haven't decided to make a prenups that obviously what you bring in the marriage is to be equally shared.
However, one should have some self respect and you can't fight someone for something he spent his life working for and that you found him with.
Besides, it's not like he was saying to her to leave empty handed; but she's just greedy and has that taste of the rich and famous that she is now enjoying far too much.
She probably thought that she would be one of the richest widow by now!
2007-10-11 10:08:26 · answer #2 · answered by Kc 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
When she arrived at the court hearing why was she wheeled into the court building, surely she could walk especially after doing the bloody tango on strictly come dancing. She has already been granted 5 times the original amount she asked for. £60 million buys a hell of a lot of wax and wood polish.
2007-10-11 05:32:44 · answer #3 · answered by Loo 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, she found him interesting for a while, and part of that, no doubt, was all that his money brought into her life. I mean, how else was a one-legged former model who lost her leg because she was drunk and walked in front of a motorcycle supposed to get to a place where she could set up a fund to help other one-legged people who lost their legs because of land mines, and how else would she have kept herself in a circle of interesting people? Of course, after a while Sir Paul became less interesting because... well... his money still gets her that stuff, eh?
2007-10-11 05:51:13 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, she would not have looked at him twice, she is a money grabbing skank and if it was not for that poor child of hers, then I would say she deserves nothing from Sir Paul.
2007-10-11 06:14:07 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, because the difference in social status would not have allowed them too meet in the first place, and would have been forbidden in English social circles.
2007-10-11 05:32:03 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There's usually only one reason a girl marries a man 30 years her senior. He was in love with her youth, she was in love with his ... good looks?
2007-10-11 05:29:50 · answer #7 · answered by True Blue Brit 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Never in a million years, it would of been Hello Goodbye, not All you need is love.
2007-10-11 06:20:59 · answer #8 · answered by G.W 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Who can say for sure but it probably would have something to do with the size of his hammer.
2007-10-11 05:30:56 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
of course free legs 4 life ;)
2007-10-11 05:30:48 · answer #10 · answered by suzie 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋