If a wild animal attacks or kills a human while in its own habitat,should it be put down?

Question

I say no!

Answer 1

Absolutely not! A wild animal lives by the laws of nature. In reality it committed no crime.

Answer 2

So do I. And if a dog attacks an intruder in its own house it should not be put down. Animals have every right to inhabit this earth as well as humans and we need to learn to respect other species and give them some space.
Humans are overpopulating the world, we're avaricious and polluting the place. We need to get our act together and control population and give the other species their rights.
If we dont we'll eventually end up killing ourselves and taking most of the animal kingdom with us.

Answer 3

I even tend to trust maximum of your factors, and in maximum situations whilst wild animals attack people this is because of the people, no longer the animals. maximum wild animals dodge people and could purely attack them whilst they sense threatened or cornered - circumstances that the people oftentimes reason. in spite of the indisputable fact that, I do think of a wild (or domesticated) animal that has attacked and killed a human could desire to be tracked down and destroyed. in lots of situations, the undeniable fact that wild animals stay far off from people and are frightened of them is using evolutionary rigidity. Animals that attack people are hunted down and killed, which over the years creates animals that are frightened of people somewhat of attacking them. additionally, animals in no way get a 'style' for people or see people as being person-friendly prey. on the same time as I understand that it is not the animals fault they act like animals, as a society we fee the existence of somebody individual extra then we do somebody wild animal. i've got not got any sympathy for somebody who's mauled or killed as quickly as they tease or disturb a wild animal, and that i think sorry that the animal is being destroyed. on the same time, we don't understand the motivations of that animal and we don't understand if it is going to start attacking human beings. next time, the guy who's attacked could be a new child or somebody who's harmless. As a edge word, animals that consume human flesh are often destroyed for well being motives. whilst animals consume human flesh, ailment / micro organism / viruses that people certainly carry (and are proof against) can mutate with ailment / micro organism / viruses that those animals carry. those illnesses could make their some time past into people in a form it quite is volatile and we aren't proof against. this is resembling the dreaded 'chicken Flu' which could come from people residing in close proximity to birds and having multiple strains of flu mutate mutually.

Answer 4

Sorry this will cost me and i love animals but if a animal in the wild kills a human it has to be humanely put down. You cant have man eaters roaming wild it is not logical, because you wouldn't want to live where a wild beast might innocently eat you as you are part of their food chain? i think not.Keep the wild animals and the humans apart so nobody gets eaten that's what i say.

Answer 5

Is a house or street It's own habitat cause they are now domestic animals - - - - I think not!

Answer 6

No it shouldn't if humans are stupid enough to go wandering around parts of the world where they know animals live then they should be prepared to accept the risks.

Answer 7

No, the human's invaded it's territory, the animal's done what it could to protect itself. So the person either got too close or didn't know what he/she was doing.

Answer 8

No..it is just being wild animal

Answer 9

absolutely not!!!!!!!!!! and it makes me so mad when a person is attacked because of their gross stupidity and the animal has to die for that. uuuggghhhh like on sanibel island all those poor gators. =(((

Answer 10

I say no too.