There's nothing twelve inches long and white.
Asian's are slightly smaller than average.
Blacks are the biggest, but they're compensating.
Latinos are average.
Whites are the variety pack of penises; all shapes, all sizes.
This is of course not the politically correct answer, however, I'm just listing the stereotypes. Hope this helps.
2007-10-11 00:30:37
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
This is a cultural stereotype. It can vary greatly from person to person. Not only that, but also consider the huge difference in the knowledge of sex and the adavncements of the industry also differ greatly in each ethnic group. Even though the Japanese are stereotypicaly considered the... smallest in the world as well as *though not as often* the least sexually active, their knowledge of sex and their advancements in the industry are by far the most advanced in the world.
Just a quick mild trip into XXX land, I want to point out that over 90% of the... Southern appendages, third legs, etc. in porno these days are fake. They are either not even part of the guy *Which is partly the reason why you don't see the full image of the guy*, or they undergo extensive plastic surgery to give them those super-freakin'-long trouser snakes.
The cost is very high and the procedure itself is highly discouraged. It costs over $12,000 just to add 1-1 1/2 inches, and the procedure can easily go wrong and some unexpected complications can arise, almost always resulting in losing most of the nerve centers down there, vastly decreasing pleasure derived from sex. And only people who are bad at sex try to have a large appendage as a poor attempt to redeem that fact.
As the saying goes, "It's not the size of the boat, it's the motion of the ocean."
Nevertheless, it still takes a long time to get to England in a rowboat.
2007-10-11 07:56:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by Lost 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
This is a difficult question to answer, because I've seen Asian men that are small (this group is famous for having small endowment) but then I've also seen Asian men that are large
I think it is more of a genetic issue than ethnicity, and since so much ethnicity is mixed that is where we get the variety of penis sizes.
All this talk about blacks being the biggest is ridiculous. I don't know where this myth came from. I've seen some Puerto Rican, German and Finnish guys that could put most black guys to shame.
It may also have to do with other factors too, like genetic mutation and nutrition.
2007-10-11 08:03:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Read many years ago that the largest are usually found on ginger haried men, my own survey results have not yet been completed on this, the same magazine article also stated that the longest could actually be found in Finland, never met a man from there, but if anyone wants to pay the airfare I am more than happy to do a quick pole (!) poll.
As for the black ones, I have never been disappointed, but then size does not denote quality, nor does width, it is in my experience what the owner does with it, and other things that count.
I would also suggest that like with bazookas, more than a 'handful' is a waste, but then I do have very large hands!!!!
As for keeping them clean, definately, you must, there is nothing more awful than putting a dirty .... oh clean that way, sorry!
2007-10-11 08:11:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by Mike B 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
I remember reading an anthropology book where some guy had measured them, and some to the conclusion that the racial average was the same, except some smaller ethnic groups had different sized penises, with the 'Sudanese Negro' being in possession of the largest average penis size.
Black guys just look bigger when then are flaccid, because they don't engorge as much as white guys. I guess a large, dangly willy would be prone to frost bite in colder climates!
2007-10-11 08:35:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Not really. There may be general trends, in the same way that facial features may be particular to one ethnic group, but there is always variation within every group. The idea that one group is universally or mostly large or small is just stereotyping.
For example, the images of Blacks that were propogated to justify slavery mentioned them as being uncontrollably lustful creatures, so it makes sense that one of the myths that sprung up around them was one which focussed on their sexuality.
2007-10-11 07:39:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by Wise Son 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I dont believe anyone has done any meaningful research into this and I am told by some people in the medical field and who work in the area that they have not noticed any significant differences on ethnic grounds and only occasionally on indvidual grounds. So I think it is all rather a myth and of course some wishful thinking by people
2007-10-11 09:52:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by Maid Angela 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Quoted in wikipedia (ok, it might not be the most reliable source in the world, but it's better than "a friend of a friend told me"):
To date, there has been no conclusive study linking penis size and race. All studies up to this point have been subject to both self selection bias and sample size flaws.
XXX? Triple X syndrome? What does anueploidy have anything to do with it?
2007-10-11 11:38:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by Equinox 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Yes its very true. Asians are renound for being the smallest. Caucasians are about average. Whereas african Americans are famous for being huge.
2007-10-11 07:26:41
·
answer #9
·
answered by spick&span 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Pakistanis brag about their large endowment.
2007-10-11 07:25:57
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 6
·
0⤊
0⤋