Do you remember the old Financial Times advertisement 'No FT, no comment. Is this a bit like the Pro McCanns who all state that they do not read newspapers or watch TV news as they dont trust what they read or see. Is that why they never have any vauable answer to give to McCann question ? quite simply they do not have a clue what is going on, and thats why their only contibution to YA is to shout abuse, report people or just make random silly comments.
Is a case for the McFanns of no read/see no comment ?
2007-10-10 20:28:02 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Yes and they love to state they don't speculate,when in fact they do, we all do whether we like to admit it or not.The ones who really get my goat are the "link? "(ers) who seldom include even a "please," i suspect the people I'm describing
are strangely incurious about things in general and are easily rattled when life deviates from what they see as "the norm".Could the McFanns be in denial of the obvious because they hate to admit they could just be wrong?Finally, I'm willing to apologise if I'm wrong on this, i therefore expect the so called "pros's" to do likewise,not an unreasonable expectation?
2007-10-10 21:42:51 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
The "pro's" don't have the true facts to comment on. No one, not the pro's or the anti's know what happened to that sweet child. The "anti's spout vile hearsay, inuendo's, supposed leaks, untruths, rumours and just plain gossip. It must be very comforting for the McCann's to know that all the anti's know the truth before the rest of the world does.
Oh, and by the way, I do watch tv and read the newpapers but I have a mind of my own and can make my own decisions.
2007-10-11 09:49:54 · answer #2 · answered by J.E.B. 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
What rot you write on a regular basis.
This case is five months old now and the likes of you continue to write tripe!
Please tell me, Mr Intellectual, why you 'anti' McCanns like to discuss such important subjects such as what clothes Kate McCann is wearing, and whether or not she should be wearing earrings.
You may use the Sun and Mirror newspaper as your guide but the rest of us with half a brain gave up trying to debate with the likes of you. We trust factual information!
You take the words 'no comment' of of context on here.
I laughed so much at your following comments
"Is that why they never have any valuable answer to give to McCann question ? quite simply they do not have a clue what is going on, and that's why their only contribution to YA is to shout abuse, report people or just make random silly comments."
The anti McCanns and their, hang em, guilty, child murderers posts are really intelligent....lol I also laugh at how the anti McCanns scream you are a child abuser because you support the McCanns everytime one of them is pushed into a corner and cannot find an intelligent response. How big and clever of you all.
As for the abuse, you have to be joking, I see how obnoxious and rude you lot are, you are somebody with numerous user ID's which is soooooooooo common amongst the anti McCann's. Please do not make out you are so innocent, so clever and so right, as you are none of those!
Witch hunting bullies, nothing more, nothing less would describe the vile lynch mob on YA.
2007-10-10 21:19:46 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Praia de Luge is renowned as a Swingers resort.
Portugal is known for its tolerance of diverse sexual tastes. All sections are catered for. Praia de Luge caters for swingers.
Do not cry foul unless you’ve done some basic research.
The McCanns and Clarence Mitchell swung together.
They had a problem with being disturbed during their adult games.
It was too risky have several groups of children asleep with babysitters as if there was a problem the group might be disturbed in the middle of their activities.
Solution. Put all the kids in one place and sedate them.
Madeleine gets an overdose.
Problem: if this gets out we are all in trouble. Doctors will be struck off for stealing sedatives, administering sedatives, people will be embarrassed. We are all equally guilty.
Solution concoct an abduction story which we all will stick by no matter what.
Help Gerry and Kate hide the body until they can dispose of it later.
Set up fund, make a million and laugh at he gullible British public.
Clarence I will be posting this theory far and wide today.
You know its something near what happened, so do the Portuguese and British Police…
So shut up Clarence or sue me. I dare you.
2007-10-10 21:02:07 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
I have neither been pro nor anti, until now...rather i believe in innocent till proven guilty and not by a court of hate mongering anti mccann yahoo answerers.
I believe "antis" are behaving in a very arrogant manner assuming they know more than the rest of the world.
I believe the "pros" usually are more open minded about the possibilities and are more inclined to wait and see what happens, why this bothers the "antis" so much is beyond me. And i supose puts me firmly in this camp.
Im not sure why this has become such a pathetic war on here...its very sad to read, when at the heart of this is a missing child.
I just wish you would all just wait and see what happens, we dont know how much is media speculation and how much is fact...we do know however that up till now there is not enough evidence to charge anyone with her disapearance.
2007-10-10 20:50:26 · answer #5 · answered by slsvenus 4 · 6⤊ 3⤋
Hear hear MOSSY.
I haven't got an opinion about the McCanns anymore.
there are so many theories going around on here that my brain is melting with it and i think it's better to wait on some real proof.
If it was them then hopefully someone will slip up or better still find the poor wee souls body.
2007-10-10 20:37:57 · answer #6 · answered by tinkerbell 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
because they are all ar se holes who think that leaving children alone and unattended while you go out on the pi ss is fine, they hate the fact that other people have views too, well said andrew t2
2007-10-11 01:41:51 · answer #7 · answered by emmamac14 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Theres no point in giving a valuable comment to somebody who has a closed mind. People with closed minds only see what they want to see and only read what they want to read or read in to whatever they see.
2007-10-10 21:03:03 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
sit down and really think about your question....what is it your trying to achieve your trying to cause aggravation and basically cause an argument.question for you,if you had 3 children under 5 would you go drinking and leave them alone?no don't think so.one word NEGLECT.
2007-10-10 20:48:16 · answer #9 · answered by karen. 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
NO COMMENT because we have been shown NO proof of anything just speculation, we believe that they left their kids unattended but we do not believe that the parents killed her, neither you nor any other armchair detective on here has any evidence to the contrary. you really should get out more you are obsessed.
2007-10-10 20:43:25 · answer #10 · answered by Dolly 6 · 3⤊ 3⤋