I'll vote for whoever I have to in order to beat Hillary.
2007-10-10 20:47:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by qwert 7
·
5⤊
3⤋
I'll hav eto see, but he looks like agood one. Then I wonder if a Muslim or morman get in can they change the laws soI can have say five wives. That would be good. It's like Savage ws saying that now it's only how much money they collect and that's the only thing the media talks about, not issues. She could be in for a rude awakening.
You cannot count out a man that pays $400 for a haircut. I wouldn't mind seeing Thompson and Newt. Newts already been through the sex scandal stuff and the guys pretty smart.
Hope everyone gets out and votes, but it may come down to who can court the "new" vote. It Bush had gotten that new bill pushed through it probably would have worked.
Then again do you know of any reason not to vote for Hillary? ha. I believe it boils down to who has the best computer software hacker and can rig the voting machines. Don't you. Then again that is perdicated on the Clintons not hlaving everybody knocked off Take care.
2007-10-11 03:40:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by R J 7
·
0⤊
6⤋
I would never vote for a Republican nor a Democrat. There are actually better candidates in the other parties. Of course, we don't hear much from those parties. I guess because the news media does not report much about them. But what is the difference between a two party sytem and a one party one? Not much, we do need to learn and know more about what is really going on. I don't see voting as something to win or lose at. I see it as a way of speaking, and losing is cool, just so they know how I spoke. No more two party for me, I want more.
2007-10-11 03:30:07
·
answer #3
·
answered by duaneb_59 5
·
2⤊
3⤋
If Hilary wins I am moving to Australia, I don't want to live in a socialist country.
Ron Paul is my vote, I guess he has increased a lot in popularity even without the media publicity, and that makes me happy to see media networks scared that there power to control the election might be dwindling, with people now free to communicate over the internet and find out candidates positions on their own.
2007-10-11 05:12:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by Nate 4
·
4⤊
2⤋
I'll vote for whichever Republican runs against her; won't matter who that is. Could be the "Mr. Bill" doll from Saturday Night Live years ago. That thing would get my vote before Clinton.
2007-10-11 05:39:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
Rudy Giuliani
2007-10-11 09:01:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by I hate Hillary Clinton 6
·
0⤊
3⤋
If votes mattered,I'd cast mine for Ron Paul.But presidents are selected,not elected.
2007-10-11 04:13:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
I'll vote for the winner, because they are already elected before Alaska polls are closed...lol!
2007-10-11 03:47:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by suanniiq 3
·
3⤊
2⤋
when you consider the possible return to the clinton.."legacy" i would vote for anyone, even a trained monkey first.
- The only president ever impeached on grounds of personal malfeasance
- Most number of convictions and guilty pleas by friends and associates*
- Most number of cabinet officials to come under criminal investigation
- Most number of witnesses to flee country or refuse to testify
- Most number of witnesses to die suddenly
- First president sued for sexual harassment.
- First president accused of rape.
- First first lady to come under criminal investigation
- Largest criminal plea agreement in an illegal campaign contribution case
- First president to establish a legal defense fund.
- First president to be held in contempt of court
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions from abroad
- First president disbarred from the US Supreme Court and a state court
2007-10-11 06:14:53
·
answer #9
·
answered by koalatcomics 7
·
5⤊
2⤋
I'm voting for whoever i want at the 08 election and look at it from there.
2007-10-11 03:43:09
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋