English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

most Americans dont agree with everything Bush is doing. Why cant we take action to force him to resign?

2007-10-10 17:58:38 · 25 answers · asked by ? 2 in Politics & Government Politics

25 answers

Excellent point. Ive been wondering the same thing for EVER !

And it's ironic, how Americans giving their strong comment on those nations under dictatorship and criticize them about being a weak nation or why don't they overthrow the cow!! or craps like that!!

IS THIS FUNNY OR WHAT!!

2007-10-10 18:06:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 7 4

For how long do you think United States was going to put the other chick, how many time USA have been attacked? Let see, for example the embassies in Africa, the TWA jet, World Trade Center twice, etc.
Look around you; don’t you feel a sensation of freedom wherever you go? Don’t you feel free to say anything you want?
This is for all “Americans” with the tendency to Socialism. Just in case, I am not an American but I love this Country like if it was my own.
I wish some of you had the chance to visit some Latin American countries so you can see what the governments (Presidents) do with the poor people. Or visit Cuba, is not too expensive, but I can assure you that when you come back you will think different.

2007-10-10 18:31:17 · answer #2 · answered by Don Lucho 2 · 1 2

The demands Obama's resignation is as a results of fact he had intel warnings of a risk problems at our embassies on 9/11 and not something became carried out to assist the protection. Hell, former ambassador to the United countries John Bolton, suggested he had 3 guards assigned to him terrific here interior the U. S.. The Libyan ambassador had ONE AFTER notifying the State Dept. that he became apprehensive for his or her protection and he knew he became on a success checklist. as a effect, 4 adult males are ineffective, and Obama went on a fund raiser to Las Vegas to rejoice. i don't care what social gathering the President is with or his frikking race. it is dereliction of accountability and a shame and Obama has proved that he isn't in positive condition to be President of this united states of america OR Commander in chief. He has to bypass.

2016-10-22 00:13:42 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

He was elected by a majority of the electoral college and can stay until January 20, 2009 unless he dies or gets impeached and convicted. No matter how much of a jerk you think he is, I doubt if that is going to happen. Sorry, we are just stuck with the guy.

2007-10-10 18:03:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 7 0

Because we have a representative government. Individuals don't have the power to force the president to resign.

2007-10-10 18:08:33 · answer #5 · answered by qwert 7 · 2 2

It simply does not work that way. The President is elected for 4 years. Unless he does something criminal, it would be unconstitutional to remove him. That is what elections are for.

2007-10-10 18:05:54 · answer #6 · answered by scarlettt_ohara 6 · 4 0

Far more people don't agree with what the Congress or Senate is doing according to the polls....you take action at the voting booth.

2007-10-10 18:03:07 · answer #7 · answered by missourim43 6 · 6 2

we are a republic, we rely on the Representatives we elect to handle political affairs. in order to do this we have to talk to congress. contact your local senate or house member to get this done.

2007-10-10 18:02:44 · answer #8 · answered by Goldwater Conservative 2 · 2 1

Americans may be unhappy with Mr. Bush, but they are sufficiently distracted from the unpleasantries.

There is still some room on those rotating credit cards to purchase their gimracks from Wal Mart.

There are intrigues on television such as the trials and tribulations of dirtbags like Britney and Lindsay. That always gets peoples attention.

Americans are well satisfied by the multitudes of fried food huts that dispense opiate-like junk nutrition.

For the moment, people´s focus are well diverted indeed.

2007-10-10 18:08:44 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 7

Since he was appointed to power in 2000 by the Supreme Court, it is no longer a government of the people, by the people, an for the people.

2007-10-10 18:06:26 · answer #10 · answered by truth seeker 7 · 1 4

fedest.com, questions and answers