We only get 4% of our oil from Iraq, bud...
If the United States was extremely desperate for oil resources, there are other countries to deal trade with, alone our own.
2007-10-10 17:37:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
During the last Republican convention, speakers mentioned Saddam and 9/11 with great frequency. This established a psychological link the didn't exist in reality. The speakers later flip flopped conveniently when asked if there is a connection between Iraq and 9/11. There were also many documented lies told related to WMD and other justifications for aggression.
Mass media played along and even gave lots of air time to bogus accusations about Democrats (funded by Republicans). It seems the media totally missed how the Republicans shredded the constitution, broke international laws, illegally invaded, and now occupy countries in the Middle East. They repeatedly call this a "war on terror", when the truth is, the US has become aggressors with little international credibility.
Al Greenspan feels that this is mostly about oil, but I also think it's also about no-bid contracts and wag the dog. The occupation has no real benefit to average Americans and it clearly has no benefit to Iraqis.
It's time to impeach GWB for abuse of power and violating his oath to support the constitution. Nobody wants an imperial presidency during the next term whether that person be Democrat or Republican. It's time to express our displeasure with the media and advertisers who have no respect for the truth.
Stop listening to the media and take the time to learn the truth. Do not support liars, whether they are politicians, corporate leaders, or media celebrities.
2007-10-10 18:12:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by Skeptic 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
first off, terrorists did not attach america on 9-11. this has been proven over and over again! they have so many documentary's about that day and the way things went down. the way those buildings fell. a plane could not have caused it. those buildings were designed to withstand such a hit.
In fact, they set ablaze to a building with the exact same temp. as in world trade center and it took that building over 24hours to collapse.
oil is the main issue, and you cant invade a country just because you want something. i know most of you will think im an idiot. but its the truth. do some research. that flight that crashed in the farm land. fighter jets shot that one down, the passangers did not stand up and take control. they claim passengers called their loved ones from 30,000ft. this was also proved incorrect. infact, you have no less then 1% chance of connecting via cell phone at that altitude.
america is the biggest shi.t disturber in the world. a big bully. they see a candy they like, they'll use all force necessary to aquire it.
what happened to north korea? wasnt bush firm regarding rogue countrys carrying nuclear weapons? what about iran?
always remember this, the media is told what they need to know. and we believ them. the same media claimed india just developed nuclear weapons in early 2000. when infact, they have had them since the 70's.. my point is, we hear and see what goverment wants us to hear and see and A LOT is covered up!
2007-10-11 10:57:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
The "war on terror" is a propoganda phrase created by the radical right wing in the USA to make people think that they are actually fighting a war that will protect them.
Most Americans strongly disagree with what Bush has done the last 7 years. The USA has been falling apart both economically and socially since he stole office. We need change and we need it soon or else the USA empire will continue to decline.
2007-10-10 18:12:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
situations have replaced my chum. Im particular if that IRA stuff could be happening now, so a lot more desirable could have taken position. it truly is unquestionably not a warfare on faith. There are terrorist obtainable attempting to kill innocuous human beings. they're making use of the religion to back there time table, so that you should ask the question WHY. we are looking for a terrorist that has threaten our united states with killing of innocuous human beings. convinced we've also killed innocuous human beings at the same time as searching for the terrorist and that is because those Cowards cover among the civilians. in the journey that they favor to wrestle step out contained in the open and dont use innocuous human beings as shields. it quite is your opinion that human beings dont like Muslims, i in my opinion have not something adverse to them. purely because there are some undesirable apples does not recommend the completed batch is ruined. in case you didnt understand, I actual have served 21yrs contained in the militia and performance been inquisitive about each and every conflict and warfare considering 1991. the following is somewhat heritage for you earlier you commence going off. Who helped Iraq in the course of the Iran-Iraq warfare, convinced it changed into the sturdy old US. Who helped the Al Qaeda construct the caves contained in the mountains of Afghanistan, yet over again the US. it truly is unlucky they became adverse to us after we helped them wrestle there battles. The links lower than receives you recommended.
2016-10-09 00:22:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
They are always trying to.
In America there has been a movement
to impeach him ever since war in Iraq
broke out.
There are big resistance and anti-war
groups with proof.
The media make sure the everyday person
watches their censored news and most people
have no idea what is really going on in the World.
Surf the net and you will find all the information
you need and maybe a group you can and
join and work with to make him accountable.
2007-10-10 18:03:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by Sandy 2
·
2⤊
2⤋
Saddam .. Financed terror all over the world. $25,000 to families that had children blow themselves up in Israeli schools, buses, bars, etc..
He killed 1,000's of his own people with chemicals..That is most definitely terror.
We discovered several terror training camps in Iraq during the war. Oh yea ... and blew them up.
Al Quadia had rep's in Iraq pre war.
2007-10-10 18:08:06
·
answer #7
·
answered by impstout2 4
·
1⤊
3⤋
The SAME way it's a "War On Drugs..."- it's a Propaganda ploy by our Government to keep us "in line" -& financing THEIR mistakes in Iraq & elsewhere. And we swallowed it- HOOK, Line & Sinker- right down to the nonsense about Sadam being a threat to OUR "National Security..." :(
2007-10-10 17:45:50
·
answer #8
·
answered by Joseph, II 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
Its about stealing Iraqi oil.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/12/world/middleeast/12oil.html?ex=1336622400&en=034ced4a02a3dcd3&ei=5088&partner=rssnyt&emc=rss
I believe that after he leaves office and a Democratic administration replaces him, nearly everyone in his administration will end up facing investigations, indictments, convictions, and jail time for their crimes.
2007-10-10 23:42:54
·
answer #9
·
answered by ♥ Cassie ♥ 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
they will when he,s dead and people reflect as they always do to late.
2007-10-10 17:38:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by fuzzy 1
·
1⤊
2⤋