using prescription drugs that she finds good for her body, and using narcotic drugs that she finds good for her mind, without the explicit, written certification from a certified medical practitioner, identified and registered with the government (society).
In the case of abortion ANOTHER human life is involved, but in this case its only her precious and sacred woman's body.
Why do the feminists condone these inhuman laws regarding rights of women on their precious and sacred woman's body? Are they only interested in the unquestionable right of women to kill fetus, without the scrutiny of the society for valid ethical or medical requirement of abortion?
2007-10-10 17:10:02 · 6 answers · asked by UseAnotherNickname 3 in Social Science ➔ Gender Studies
"Doctors have decided"
"government has prohibited/controlled"
"The issue is about medical opinion, not moral opinion"
"reprehensible because they're so dangerous"
All this on the precious and sacred body of my wife, who is a woman? Shame on you! Who is to decide what is good or bad for her? Its her body, her decision. And let me assure you, many narcotics are used as prescription medicine and most are less harmful even after prolonged use, compared the effect of an abortion on a female body and mind.
2007-10-10 17:47:17 · update #1
The question is not on what anybody personally does or does not.
Feminists, non-feminists, anti-feminists.. anybody can answer. The answer sought is not "why they..." but "why the FEMINISTS..."
2007-10-10 21:01:59 · update #2
of course it is her body and her decision. I personally do not support laws limiting narcotic drug use. if you want to use drugs, knock yourself out. As far as perscriptions, I personally dont care what another person does with their body, but I can understand why medical professionals are so restrictive with them. If a patient misuses theirperscription, the doctor who issues it is held responsible, which is just as bogus as laws against drug use.
in thew case of abortion, it is yet again, nione of my businessm, because it is not my body.
I am a feminist, so what is your point again? to show feminist hypocrisy? not on this issue, not with me.
2007-10-10 20:55:02 · answer #1 · answered by bluestareyed 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Illogical. Doctors have decided that some drugs were dangerous, so, the government has prohibited/controlled them. The medical-scientific establishment doesn't consider an abortion "killing" a fetus and have not come to the conclusion that abortion is as dangerous as say, heroin or cocaine. The issue is about medical opinion, not moral opinion. Illegal drugs aren't considered morally reprehensible just because, they're considered morally reprehensible because they're so dangerous.
2007-10-11 00:30:07 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Which of the drugs would You flush down the toilet in order to save Her life and improve Her well being?
2007-10-11 01:42:22 · answer #3 · answered by Ashleigh 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
why don't you take her sacred and precious body and hold it against you. then, maybe you'll have less time to ask questions like these.
2007-10-11 00:56:04 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Apples and oranges
2007-10-11 00:41:44 · answer #5 · answered by G 6 · 4⤊ 2⤋
It is because women have rights not responsibilities. Where men have responsibilities not rights. Sexist but true
2007-10-11 00:21:57 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 6⤋