2007-10-10 16:33:59 · 5 answers · asked by LUCKY3 6 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
Man or woman...
2007-10-10 16:34:45 · update #1
This isn't as simple as it first appears.
We are all born with certain innate tendencies, & I won't bore you with psychobabble about how they can, or cannot be impacted by environment, etc. The fact is that children, teens etc. can have the exact same environment & be the antitithesis of each other. Does this mean that the basic nature of one prevails, & the other doesn't, & why?
"Bondage" seems a bit strong word to use, yet in a way, those who are born sociopaths,(for example), never change. They are born without conscience & absolutely nothing can instill, impart this to them. One "could" interpret this as bondage,. although bondage implies something "imposed" on another.
2007-10-10 17:23:20 · answer #1 · answered by Valac Gypsy 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No, man has to pay for bondage, nature is free.
Seriously, No; a man's nature changes the more he knows himself and the more he questions himself. The fact that man will question what he know is proof enough that he is free.
2007-10-10 16:56:36 · answer #2 · answered by LORD Z 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Oh I hope so! I love to figure people out, see what makes them tick. If man could change his nature so easily my hobby would be quite impossible!
2007-10-12 13:53:01 · answer #3 · answered by delux_version 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes but for most people society shapes changes and rules you so you no longer are quite so ruled by your nature. anti-social personalities are not effected by this or changed by society they are truely ruled by nature.
2007-10-10 16:39:26 · answer #4 · answered by Andria W 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think so
2007-10-11 00:47:05 · answer #5 · answered by usa 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋