English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I'm asking a sincere question. You don't need to explain your position. I'd prefer just a yes or no answer.

2007-10-10 15:39:51 · 7 answers · asked by Glen B 6 in Politics & Government Elections

7 answers

No. (Anything that Rodham-Clinton touches is bad news.)

2007-10-10 19:55:25 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

NO!

because it will raise the Middle Class's Taxes and that will leave us with less money to spend on things we need and want. The Rich know how to keep more of there own money and pay little in taxes to begin with (tax shelters, offshore accounts etc.). So a vote for a Democrat is a vote for higher taxes on the Middle Class.

2007-10-11 19:14:14 · answer #2 · answered by davedgreat2000 2 · 2 1

No. That's one of the reasons I switched from a Democrat to a Republican to vote for Ron Paul.

2007-10-11 02:57:47 · answer #3 · answered by just me 4 · 1 1

Name a Governement, any time, any country, that has run ANYTHING even remotely well.. It is the same reason that no Socialist Governement anytime anywhere has worked.
No I am not for Governement run healthcare.

2007-10-11 00:01:07 · answer #4 · answered by hironymus 7 · 2 1

Yes.

2007-10-12 04:00:11 · answer #5 · answered by Elizabeth J 5 · 0 1

Democrats wanted to implement health care for the good of the people.

2007-10-10 23:06:47 · answer #6 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 1 5

I'd like to give you a one word anser, but I can't it has to be two words.
HELL NO !!!!!!!

2007-10-10 23:47:07 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

fedest.com, questions and answers