2007-10-10 14:35:20 · 13 answers · asked by politicallypuzzeled 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
i assume that you are referring to the harrassment that the right wing has done to the 12 year old who gave a democratic radio address and their hamhanded attempts at intimidating his family.
i have to agree here - it's pretty baffling that the republicans would actually support sending out these bloodthirsty pundits to this guy's house and his father's place of work
the guys' father makes $45K a year as a carpenter and can't afford to get health insurance for his family. his family was in a car wreck and the kid and his sister were badly hurt.
so what do the insane conservative pundits do? they harrass this poor man, his children and his family - michelle malkin said right to his face that she didn't believe that he couldn't afford health insurance.
rush limbaugh railed on and on today about it.
these guys bought their home for $60k many years ago - now the neighborhood is nice, so many very very stupid assmptions have been made.
the cons really are tone deaf and vicious.
i really don't see how they have any support left at this point.
i know because of actions like this (and the rubber stamp support of bush) i won't ever vote repube again...
2007-10-10 14:41:46 · answer #1 · answered by nostradamus02012 7 · 1⤊ 5⤋
No, those style of coverage judgements at the instant are not made on such stupid assumptions. i think of it replace right into a strategic determination on behalf of the indoors maximum healthcare foyer. If the democrats can get it pushed for toddlers then the aptitude very heavily exists for the Hillary Plan of time-honored inner maximum healthcare. i think of the healthcare lobbying marketplace very heavily realizes that persons on the whole might choose a socialized equipment of a few sort. (in all probability something alongside the Canadian line) Lobbyists do no longer take those style of possibilities. and additionally ingredient in if the invoice surpassed tobacco taxes might improve the cost of cigs by employing 50+ cents a p.c... vast tobbaco additionally has an significant foyer that confident sufficient Republicans to vote no. So in answer on your question the Republicans at the instant are not that cynical of their determination making.
2016-10-21 23:47:35 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Dems are playing politics with this issue and you are eating it up. The program is designed to help POOR people, not provide free care for the middle class. They knew this bill was dead on arrival when they wrote it.
Maybe you should stop with the "repubs hate children" crap and think about the issue a little bit.
2007-10-10 15:19:47 · answer #3 · answered by thetruthhurts2025 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I do not hate children at all, they are very cute and entertaining. I hate their parents that have them and then won't provide for them and expect me to pay taxes to provide for something that they should be doing. Once again, why in the world would you want Government sponsored health care? I will never understand that. I am still waiting for my passport, I would be dead now if it was a heart.
Do you think your hero Hillary will be standing in the same line as you? I don't think so, she will have her own Doctor like everyone else should have privately paid for.
2007-10-10 14:42:07 · answer #4 · answered by El Guapo 4 · 3⤊ 5⤋
It's not so much the helping people part that anyone is bothered by, as it is the seizing people's hard-earned possessions by force to pay for it part.
2007-10-10 15:25:22 · answer #5 · answered by scoot7 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
That is a Stupid thing to say. Its not the governments responsibility to raise and care for your children. It must be terrible to be so Ignorant.
2007-10-10 15:11:59 · answer #6 · answered by Johnny Reb 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
I don't hate kids...had 3 of my own and PAID for the healthcare on my own. What I hate is thieving liberals picking my pocket with crackpot socialist scams.
If you can't feed em, house them, care for them, don't breed em.
2007-10-10 15:07:51 · answer #7 · answered by commanderbuck383 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
What a crock. Why should my tax dollars pay for medical coverage for a family making in excess of $80K a year? This is just another blatent attempt by the loopycrats to buy votes with these stupid promises and my tax dollars.
2007-10-10 14:46:22 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 4⤋
Why would Democrats use Children as political pawns?
2007-10-10 15:51:05 · answer #9 · answered by smsmith500 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Why do the dems try to pass a bill that is bogus and costly for the American Citizens not to mention something that would be considered a Socialist movement?
2007-10-10 14:39:56 · answer #10 · answered by ja man 5 · 5⤊ 5⤋