The Histories by Herodotus?

Question

In Book III of The Histories, Herodotus states the 3 forms of government and their pros and cons. Does Herodotus seem to favor one type of government (monarchy, oligarchy, or democracy)? If so, how?

Answer 1

In Book III, Herodotus tells how when the conspirators against the Magi met, they discussed the pros and the cons of the different forms of the management of the country of Persia. Otanes favored Democracy, Megabyzus favored Oligarchy, and Darius Monarchy. Each gives a convincing argument, but in the end four out of the seven endorsed Darius' view.

If Herodotus favored Democracy, then it is by the action of Otanes renouncing his claim to the kingdom on the condition that he and his descendants should never be ruled by any of the other conspirators. The others agreed to this, and to the time of the writing of the Histories the house of Otanes was the only house in Persia which remained free. Otanes had earned his autonomy, obeyed the laws of the Persians, and was only subject to the king to the extent that he wished to be.

Answer 2

The Greeks fought area by utilising area with different Greeks. The Persians have been made out of Armies from throughout that did no longer even communicate a similar language. The Greeks had plenty heavier armor and weapons and that they chosen the battlefield to no longer enable the Persians open land to combat on. they did no longer prefer to be slaves under Persian administration. The Persians weren't scuffling with for their freedom.