2007-10-10 12:29:02 · 13 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I approve on the war on terror - but this war in Iraq has been going on for way too long. We should have just bombed the major target areas and left them to fend for themselves.
The bigger problem is in our own country. I'd like to see that $500 billion dollars go towards securing our borders & deporting those who are residing here illegally.
2007-10-10 12:33:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 5⤋
I wouldn't dump it out of a plane but there are many things it could be used for to help Americans. It would be different if the war hadn't been one lie after another and if we finished the Afghanistan war first. At the time, if anyone voted against the war, you were unpatriotic according to our leaders,and with 911 on our minds, I guess we had to get even somehow
and this was an available way.
2007-10-10 19:42:45 · answer #2 · answered by searching 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The war is necessary. It removed a tyrant that wanted to take over the Middle East and replaced him with Democracy. Also, it is clear Iraq was and still is a breeding ground for terrorism. $500 billion is a lot, but it's worth the price to keep America safe.
2007-10-10 19:38:47 · answer #3 · answered by mustagme 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would rather dump $500 billion of chemicals on Iraq at the beginning. Then save the trillion we've already spent.
2007-10-10 19:35:06 · answer #4 · answered by Brian H 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
wait until they go after Iran.
You'll have a few more trillions to throw at the american people rather than waste on a frivolous illegal war.
2007-10-10 19:34:53 · answer #5 · answered by Cristina 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Iraq, we must finish the job; the US has learned that it cannot half *** major military objections any more. A lesson Clinton, Carter, Nixon, and Reagan needed to have learn.
2007-10-10 19:33:54 · answer #6 · answered by Strats!! 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Hell yeah! Then maybe I could pick some of it up and put it in my pocket. At least I'd get something out of it, instead of all the money thrown into that quagmire in the Middle East.
2007-10-10 19:32:08 · answer #7 · answered by Craig S 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Not sure, but war with Iraq WAS necassary
Saddam dissed the US
2007-10-10 19:31:17 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
All the best wars are unnecessary. Simply giving creepy foreigners a bloody good thrashing. That's why they are fun.
2007-10-10 19:33:22 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
I would rather spend it in Iraq than seeing it go to health care for mutant liberals children who they can't afford to support because they are lazy slackers.
2007-10-10 19:32:01 · answer #10 · answered by I Laugh At Morons 3 · 3⤊ 3⤋