English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

She and her "husband" hollowed-out our military in order to "balance" the budget. She wouldn't exactly project strength to nations that are hostile to the U.S.

2007-10-10 12:08:22 · 41 answers · asked by ? 2 in Politics & Government Politics

You left-wing loons are very entertaining. The only downside is that you can probably vote.

2007-10-10 12:14:45 · update #1

41 answers

Maybe safe for the lesbian and metro sexual cabal trying to get her elected.

2007-10-10 12:11:22 · answer #1 · answered by I Laugh At Morons 3 · 8 9

Obviously, since she is the front runner against both Democrats and Republicans there are many who believe she will do that. I have a feeling we will all find out starting January 20, 2009. By the way that hollowed military was started before Clinton. See if you can find out how many bases were closed by Bush sr.

2007-10-10 12:21:01 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Hilary wouldn't be the best candidate for anyone thinking that staying in Iraq promotes the safest environment for America. If she wins the primaries, it would be a tough call to make. She's not all that bad compared to the other candidates running. They all have some tolerable positions on topics.

Her politics and ideas have a long way to come if she wants my vote though.

I will say that she does seem more open to opinions than Bush.

2007-10-10 12:19:24 · answer #3 · answered by Ryan the wizard 2 · 3 2

You know what? I love America, but I hate the government. I wish Bush would be arrested by the International Police(Interpol) and charged with crimes against humanity. And now that I've said that, the SS(I mean, Secret Service, not the Schutzstaffel, though they're basically the same thing... You know, serve as the bodyguards for the oppressive leader...) will come after me again. Yes. AGAIN!

2007-10-10 12:34:00 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Despite the fact that you have your mind already made up and despite the fact that your question is demeaning not only to a Senator and a former President of our grand country, your question is disrespectful of people who do not agree with your perspective.

Since your mind is already made up, let me point out to you that General Patraeus himself acknowledged what the overwhelming majority of the country knows (including statements from our entire intelligence community, the Baker report, etc, etc): George W Bush and Dick Cheney have lowered our level of safety with their war in Iraq.

And to address the point about the balanced budget: The years under Bill Clinton, whatever you think of him as a person, included creation of 420 million new jobs and economic growth never before (or after) realized by our nation. Since then, the government has grown by about 4-fold, we have a staggeringly humungous debt and the value of our dollar is circling the bowl. We spend $200 million dollars per day in Iraq. That's about $6 billion per month. Six billion per month to get our courageous troups killed and maimed and lower our nation's security level.

Our utter failure in Iraq and complete lack of successful diplomacy spear-headed by the staggeringly incompetent Dr. Rice 'doesn't exactly project strength to nations that are hostile to the US' either.

2007-10-10 12:25:01 · answer #5 · answered by swimeveryday 4 · 1 3

Frankie says relax ...and Vote for John Edwards.

ps: That "hollowed out military" is the same one Bush is fighting the war with.

2007-10-10 12:21:46 · answer #6 · answered by Zardoz 7 · 0 2

Her husband was the first to actually attack Osama bin Laden. Another Clinton presidency would focus on the real criminal of 9/11, Osama bin Laden, and would not let him go because he's "marginalized." Murderers should not be marginalized but brought to justice.

2007-10-10 13:15:15 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

The Democratic social gathering includes many tepid progressives, made up of "spineless fiber"...a great amalgam of co-opted politicians who some time past abandoned their base. Democrats are gentle and pliant, Bush-lite, desirous of appeasing their fascist neo-con brethren. They proceed helping yet yet another unlawful conflict, so good in that help that their ethics and morality crumbles. . .whilst they profess the moral intense floor. and that they spend greater on conflict, lower back -- because of the fact status for their twisted "patriotic" concepts makes their palms bloody -- quite of ending the conflict and washing them sparkling. Write to your unfastened set of bloody palms. connect the Democratic social gathering, politicians who abrogate their accepted jobs as they proceed giving George W. Bush the unconstitutional skill to make conflict, injury cities, kill darker skinned human beings, and make torture an device of foreign places coverage. Clinton's place shift on abortion portends greater desirable tacking to the political right. As yet another occasion of Democrats capitulating to the final evaluate Martin Frost, former member of Congress from Dallas TX (D), who ran as an opponent against Howard Dean for being the top of the Democratic social gathering's national Committee. After Dean gained, Frost grew to alter right into a information reporter for FOX information. Frost found out nicely a thank you to play the interest after spending 13 words as a Democrat interior the residing house of Representatives. To think of that Frost might, had he gained, have been in charge for steerage the Democratic social gathering. Frost's circulate to FOX says plenty with regards to the Democratic social gathering dedication to its classic base values. It says plenty with regards to the Democratic social gathering.

2016-11-07 22:36:56 · answer #8 · answered by hohl 4 · 0 0

no politician can make this country "safe". there was a time when ordinary americans had the courage to face dangers no matter where the dangers originated. now they are scared fools riding in their SUVs, talking on their call phone and expecting someone else to "keep them safe" my safety, my home's safety and my country's safety is my responsibility. any politician who sez they can keep you safe is a liar

2007-10-10 12:18:26 · answer #9 · answered by oldguy 6 · 4 0

NOT A CHANCE! Plus she just hired Sandy Burglar , who stole documents from the Nation Archives Library! The Clintons will do anything to get power. The past speaks for itself.
Bills policy was to ignore the Terrorists attacks and pray it won't happen again!

2007-10-10 12:17:16 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 7 3

No one will ever be able to "keep America safe."

We can only defend ourselves when people who hate us attack. But, as the saying goes - "Where there's a will, there's a way."

People who hate America WILL always find a way to attack America. Same goes for any country or person on the planet.

2007-10-10 12:13:27 · answer #11 · answered by theMeganEffect 3 · 5 2

fedest.com, questions and answers