Utter gibberish.
You sure do believe a load of garbage. You have the nerve to ask this in science? There's rooms for mythology and folklore you know.
2007-10-10 11:32:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by Leviathan 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
That is an interesting idea, but doesn't hold up if you think about it.
If humans knew how to travel space at the speed of light "only" 5,000 years ago, there should be way more archaeological evidence than there is. Such an advanced technology could not have vanished so completely so quickly.
There is ample archaeological evidence that the pyramids are 5,000 years old and that people at that time built those things with the tools and methods known to them. It was way more trouble and effort to do than we today would consider reasonable, but certainly not impossible. Priorities were totally different in those days.
No asteroid hit could change the axis of Earth's rotation, at least not by more than a tiny fraction of one degree.
2007-10-10 11:35:19
·
answer #2
·
answered by campbelp2002 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Pyramids are psychologically satisfying forms that are part of the collective consciousness of the human race, which is why they're such a common shape to be built among older civilizations. They were actually deceptively simple to build, as well. They'd create a huge mound of sand and then build downwards, removing sand and replacing the displaced area with blocks of stone. The crystal skulls also fail to be compelling evidence, since they are terran in origin.
If we were at one time a space-faring race, there would have been far more intriguing artifacts left over, such as, oh I don't know, maybe a SPACE VESSEL of some sort, right?
An alteration of the axis would alter environmental conditions drastically, but that fails to support your thesis, as well. Really, you're grabbing at straws here, attempting to shove flimsy, unsupportable evidence into a grandiose theory that already collapses onto itself under its own implausibility. So, in short, you're doing everything a true conspiracy nut excels at. Well done.
2007-10-10 11:34:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by damlovash 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
I could desire to say sorry up front with you because of the fact this is going to sound insulting. yet what you're attempting to do is stress sq. pegs into around holes. there is no longer something to assist those issues you reported as being from an extremely large stronger civilization. There may be no reason to assist the thought of coming back. And to come again back for what? Crystal Skulls, what for? Pyramids? Please meet me a million/2 way on your concept. assume there replace right into a former civilization here in the worldwide. Very stronger. They left. and that they proceed to be long previous. We listed here are whats left of persons which could no longer make the trip because of the fact of multiple motives. Too ill for the trip, political prisoners left in the back of, those antagonistic to leaving the earth for sentimental motives, people who feared polluting the celebrities. ok? If there replace right into a complicated civilization, then they perished, yet to no longer the celebrities.
2016-10-21 23:19:18
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Crystal Skulls.
Pyramids.
Travelling across the galaxy.
You've just finished watching Season 4 of Stargate SG-1, haven't you?
2007-10-10 11:41:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by Rob K 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, they are aliens. They will look different. We need to accept them and introduce our selves when they get here.
Here's my plan. If you ever see one, rip all you clothes off and turn in slow circles till they do the same thing.
2007-10-10 11:40:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
youre a nutzo bag!!
2007-10-10 11:43:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by Hannah M 1
·
1⤊
0⤋