English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Thanks! =)

2007-10-10 10:34:00 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music Polls & Surveys

Thanks, everyone!

2007-10-10 10:42:26 · update #1

26 answers

Yeah, it's an old-fashioned female first name. But it's also a last name.

2007-10-10 10:37:09 · answer #1 · answered by paperback_beedle 3 · 1 1

Yes, and it's also spelt Gaye. It is an old name from the days when gay meant cheerful, happy, bright (writers used the phrase "gay colors/clothes/demeanor"). The modern meaning is different, and is often used in an abusive way.

2007-10-10 10:43:37 · answer #2 · answered by jenesuispasunnombre 6 · 0 1

Gaylord Focker

2007-10-10 10:37:24 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

Went to school with two sisters--one named Gay and the other was named Hester. I'm sure their parents were delightful.

2007-10-10 10:38:49 · answer #4 · answered by Valkyrie 7 · 1 1

promptly adult men will call some adult men good-looking in the event that they in high-quality condition societies definition of the suitable male physique.yet you may desire to realize that adult men dont think of adult men are the greater effectual looking than women people by employing any stretch like women people think of ladies people idealize elegance. women people regularly say looking a member of a similar intercourse aesthetically friendly doesn’t lead them to gay, and that's authentic. as a remember of fact, i've got faith every physique who hates his/her intercourse sufficient to contemplate his/her gender’s physique intrinsically grotesque has subject concerns. yet, the archetypical female doesn’t supply up there, she additionally says “women all people is greater alluring than adult men” and this time issues are very distinctive. whilst comparing adult men to women people, they're judging a image (“elegance”) interior of a dichotomous format; it has no longer something to do with looking one’s intercourse aesthetically friendly or no longer (a case we already uncovered), this time that's some “geared up in” (yet moderated by employing society) bigotry which will render one intercourse’s actual traits greater alluring than the different’s. this concern of course includes sexual orientation because of the fact the gadgets would be evaluated in line with sexual attributes; and because the two sexes at the instant are not equivalent, the effect can't be something yet a Boolean (the two male traits render the male intercourse greater effectual looking or female traits render women people greater effectual looking, somebody who says they're the two eye-catching is mendacity because of the fact that we initiate off from the inspiration of thinking the two sexes visually distinctive and somebody who says they're distinctive is only eluding the assessment at the same time as putting forward the obtrusive). maximum women all people is lesbian (they locate the female physique greater aesthetically friendly , they desire to look at women people, and so on.) leaning bisexuals (they seem for carriers, see intercourse as a activity, and so on) by employing nature; i don't get why all people is so reluctant to settle for this fact. I mean, this is hardly a revelation.

2016-10-21 23:10:47 · answer #5 · answered by joleen 4 · 0 0

It has to be. I've never hear of a guy named Gay, only gay guys. Hope that helps!

2007-10-10 10:37:39 · answer #6 · answered by WooleyBooley again 7 · 1 1

Wow, I can't believe you have never heard of Gaylord Focker.

2007-10-10 12:18:30 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes it is, but not too commonly used anymore due to other meanings. Also, Gaylord for men has become less favorable.

2007-10-10 10:40:04 · answer #8 · answered by ~ Floridian`` 7 · 1 1

I actually know two women named Gay.

2007-10-10 10:37:03 · answer #9 · answered by bye bye 5 · 2 1

My mother has a friend named Gaye.

2007-10-10 10:39:36 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers