I live in Idaho and even though Craig has done great things for my state, Id give him a pink slip.
Next... (I hope I dont regret saying this) would be Guliani. Hes a liberal with GOP pin on his jacket.
2007-10-10 08:38:49 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
GRIPS- Yeah, him too! I agree
2007-10-10 08:42:17 · update #1
It's too late to fire George Bush, so I would have to say McCain.
Not sure I agree with you on Guliani. I heard he was pro-choice and that raised my eyebrow. But then I heard him speak on abortion, and he took the exact same stance as I would if I were running for public office: I am personally against it. I think Roe V. wade was bad law, in that it has no basis in constututionality. I don't think the Federal Goverment has any standing to outlaw abortion, nor do I think it should stand as a guarantor of an invented "right" to abortion or privacy. I do not support the use of government funds to subsidize abortions.
These are the exact same words Guliani used on the Hugh Hewitt show a few weeks back. I don't thnk he's as liberal as people popularly think. He does seem to be a big-government guy, though, which is against him. He doesn't seem to grasp the concept of cutting off the nourishment from the illegals, and let them deport themselves.
I think he and Romney both have the chops to take the job. . . .I'm a little uneasy about Romney's religion. Not that I have anything against Mormons from a political or cultural standpoint, but Mormonism is a cult (a very successful and well recognized cult, but a cult nontheless), and I have to wonder about electing a cult member to public office, particularly at a time when we seem to be at war with the forces of another very successful cult.
2007-10-10 09:06:52 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Which political social gathering has those rules? a million. supply instructors the skill to apply violence (corporal punishment) to place youngsters in line 2. Reinstate the dying Penalty, because of the fact revenge and justice are a similar element regardless of each and every little thing are not they? (sarcasm) 3. enable human beings to have an AK-40 seven of their residing house to guard themselves in the event that they comprehensive national service (2005 Manifesto) 4. supply foreign places immigrants "beneficiant grants" to bypass away the rustic. it particularly is a brilliant theory isn't it? How will they pay for those foreigners to bypass away? Will this make our taxes bigger? 5. convey lower back Grammar colleges and positioned across lower back 11 and 13 checks. So the toddlers that do rubbish in those checks won't get a similar threat at Secondary college because of the fact people who do nicely. Very equivalent isn't it? 6. Abolish anti-discrimination legislations. 7. Make all youngsters learn christian values regardless of their ideals. So although i'm a Buddhist, i could be made to earnings Christian values yet no longer of alternative ideals? How is that for being a social gathering that helps freedom and equality?
2016-11-07 22:06:44 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Larry Craig
Ron Paul
Ted Stevens
2007-10-10 09:13:13 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm with billyboy64.....ALL OF THEM...time to start over from scratch.
The truth of this is that we can give them a pink slip (and it doesn't have to be on paper)...every election for the next 10 years, vote OUT the incumbent - regardless of which party you belong to. I don't believe the founding Fathers ever intended for Representation to become a career!!!!!
2007-10-10 09:02:46 · answer #4 · answered by Becca 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
How about the heads of each party with the hope that they will stop being so self-serving and actually solve some problems instead of causing new ones?
2007-10-10 08:42:58 · answer #5 · answered by Phil M 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
All with even a hint of corruption of the Constitution, Laws and Int'l Geneva Law.
(isn't the focus on Craig a distraction from the MAJOR wrongs being brushed over?)
2007-10-10 08:42:28 · answer #6 · answered by truthorcon 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I don't feel I have a party. If I were a democrat I would have to vote for Joe Lieberman, and people who wanted to give rights to illegal aliens would be next.
2007-10-10 08:42:11 · answer #7 · answered by Zardoz 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I was disappointed with Sen. Bob Casey (D-PA) when he did not vote yay for federally funded research (I wrote him a letter it was just rhetoric bs)
Gov. Ed Rendell let PA legislature (even newly elected) vote for an increase in pay in a midnight vote. (I wrote him a letter) with so many PA residents pissed off, that vote was overturned in the PA Supreme Court.
2007-10-10 08:44:34 · answer #8 · answered by Global warming ain't cool 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I'd get rid of Lieberman. He plays too well with Christian Fundamentalists. And he's trying to use US muscle against Iran now, for the alleged benefit of Israel. Well, that was tried with Iraq. How did that work out? Israel any better off?
2007-10-10 08:45:11 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
John McCain
2007-10-10 08:40:40 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋