Liberals, will you be angry since the U.S.A. military goals have been met for 2007?

Question

http://www.defenselink.mil/releases/release.aspx?releaseid=11398

Maybe these men will be:

John Murtha- defamed our Marines by spreading bogus lies about them. For example, he said they murdered in "cold blood".

John Kerry- flipped the bird at our war vets, called our troops stupid, and said we couldn't win in Iraq.

Dick Durbin- called our toops "Nazis".

I don't know about you.

Do you think the liberals will think it's too patriotic?

GOD BLESS AMERICA!

Answer 1

I'm defineatly with you guys, and against all the Libtards
in Congress, the Senate and thier lapdog media.

The US military is the most invincible force the world has ever seen, and it will crush, anyone, who dares chalange
our will. Then we will proceed to re-build thier tattered lands in our own image, that they may be greatfull to us in our
infinite charity and benevolence in letting these lesser
barbarian mongrel people continue to live amoung us.

The question was,

"U.S.A. military goals have been met for 2007? "

The Answer, absolutely, shock and awe baby !
Kick'n *** and tak'n names, and with the help
of our private sector brothers in arms !
_________________________

The link provided is to recruitment goals.
Published by the DOD.

No mention there, on the finacial cost of
that in relation to US tax payers.
Wich is the other side of that coin, (pun) and
some might find that interesting, and also telling.

This might help, it's from a non-partisan source;

We're mak'n money hand over fist, on the re-construction side, and wait until
the oil money really kicks in .

http://usgovinfo.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?site=http://www.cbo.gov/

Here's a link to some interesting statisitcal research
along recruitment lines.

http://fairuse.100webcustomers.com/fairenough/bost78.html

At least our guys won't have to deal with these Libtard losers.
___________________
Then somebody else added this, with no supporting
information link.


"Probably not as angry as some liberals were to learn that casualties in Iraq were slashed in half"

Half ? Try one sixteenth !
Please check the facts at ;
http://icasualties.org/oif/US_chart.aspx

Seasonal conditions vary in iraq, just like most other places
on earth.

The way to read the graphs in terms of determining the trend is to compare, Sept. 04, to Sept. 05, to Sept. 06, to Sept. 07,etc.

You do the math the US is kick'n *** and tak'n names. shock and awe baby, shock and awe !

Once again, check it out at;
http://icasualties.org/oif/US_chart.aspx

Good Luck with the research.
God Bless America and crush the enemies of our
will and Freedom !

On to Iran, Syria, Pakistan, Russia, China, India, Venesella, Cuba, Mexico, Canada, France, the Aussies, and Brits too if they don't smarten up !

LuvUAll, Ba-bye.

Answer 2

This is too easy of a softball question. First we would have been speaking the Queen's English. Then shortly thereafter we would be speaking Spanish. If we were to every get back to be under England's rule again, we would then in WWI be learning German. If for some reason, England won the World War, we would definitely be speaking German by 1945. After 1945, and WWII our German would probably be exchanged for Russian and Sometime in the future, we would be speaking Chinese. In any event, if given the following choice: 1) Live as a rich man as a citizen of some other country or 2) Live as a poor man in the USA. I would much rather be a poor man in the USA. I hope this helps explain what my feelings are and the reason I am constantly thanking our military forces for keeping America the Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave!

Answer 3

Rest assured there is success in Iraq in the past months . If a liberal wants proof all they have to do is watch any Liberal Socialist Bias` News Media and notice how their reporting has decreased on the war . There are improved situations in Iraq and the Bias` media has nothing to throw up in the news as an example of "failures`". You will note , now that there is nothing that they can exaggerated about , they are now switching to "the security groups" committing so called unproven crimes, and lying about Talk Radio ! Doesn`t it ever enter a liberals` mind that their Socialist Bias` News Media "never" has anything good to report about anything they don`t have a hand in ?? Nothing ever but Doom & Gloom. Liberals` will someday have to admit that even they cannot be right on everything 100% of the time , it just ain`t gonna` happen !

Answer 4

I tend to think they'd be upset, through my experience with Liberals. American soldiers must not do well. If they do, Mr. Bush may have great influence on the people when election time comes around. Who do you think? Fred Thompson, or Mitt Romney?

God Bless America, and the Troops!

Answer 5

Don't forget Bill O' Riley's total disregard of our troops lives

"U.S. forces captured SS forces who had their hands in the air and they were unarmed, and they shot them down. You know that. That's on the record. Been documented."
- Bill O' Riley

This is NOT the way it happened! It was SS forces who captured U.S. soldiers, took them prisoner but then since they could not handle all of the soldiers, they took those 84 American troops into a field, lined them up, told them to put their hands over their heads and shot all of them.

He said this not ONCE but TWICE! TWICE he not only insulted those troops but BLAMED THEM for killing the people who killed them! But it gets better...Fox News then went back and changed the transcripts! They would not admit that O'Riley had said ANYTHING wrong. It is an insult to the troops that died that day!

I do not bash troops nor do I support bashing troops. I am skeptical about how this war has been going still. I just do not support that we were tricked into going and staying there. Lets just get Iraq officials trained and get out. Just because O' Riley said the things he said does not mean you agree with that and just because Dick Durbin insulted the troops does not mean I agree with what he said. Don't put their words into my mouth.

Answer 6

Since when have we had a goal in Iraq? If there is some hidden agenda we need to hear it. If, indeed, some plan has been met than great! Finally a plan, at last. But since your citation is merely recruiting goals, so what? I am not interested in recruiting goals. Tell me how will we know we have won in Iraq.

Answer 7

Casualty reduction is because the shiites have been ordered to stop fighting for awhile. DUHHHHH I thinks the cons are angry because 3 of 18 just isnt very good.

Answer 8

They'll just blame Republicans for being patriotic and call those brave men and woman "poor" and "uneducated."

Answer 9

Can you give links to where these people have said what you are claiming they have said?

Answer 10

This tin-foil hat moment brought to you by anti-lib, easily the most whacko NeoCon in this group.