English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I would in a heartbeat!

2007-10-10 07:44:23 · 34 answers · asked by TriSec 3 in Politics & Government Politics

34 answers

in a nuclear bomb to the mideast second....

2007-10-10 07:47:36 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5 9

No. the place has his "large compassion" been at the same time as 3000+ troops have died in a pointless conflict started on lies and defective intelligence? Why did he enable the Bin weighted down kinfolk depart the U.S. after 9/11? He says he needs to combat terrorism , yet he replace into prepared reachable over our ports to a Dubai based corporation, what greater effectual thank you to enable terrorists in to our u . s .? whilst invoice Clinton left there replace right into a surplus of $235 billion. because of the fact that George Bush Jr. took place of work, the excess has been depleted and his administration funds reflects over a $4 hundred billion federal deficit. He has brought about the U. S. to lose the honour and allies it as quickly as had. finally, he's only undeniable stupid.

2016-10-21 22:46:42 · answer #2 · answered by riva 4 · 0 0

I didn't in 2000 or 2004 and would never vote for any member of the Bush family. Period!!!

2007-10-10 08:14:11 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Nope! I really like him, and I don't think the war would end very well if we got someone with different convictions in the office (*cough* Democratic candidates); even so, I don't trust anyone to remain in the position of "most powerful person in the world" for more than a few years, even George Bush, because eventually the power will start going to their head and they'll start doing really scary things with it. (As evidence, I present FDR, who so dearly loved experimenting with the future of the country that he got himself elected to the Presidency four times and caused a royal amount of hell in the ensuing time, a lot of which has yet to be remedied.)

2007-10-10 07:56:07 · answer #4 · answered by Richard S 5 · 3 7

I never voted for that man to begin with.
I would never vote for him even if he could be elected for a third term in office.

2007-10-10 07:55:14 · answer #5 · answered by cuimhni_na_heireann 1 · 8 4

Fist Bush election: I didn't vote... even though I could have... a mistake I will not make again as long as I live.

Second Bush election: I voted Kerry

Third Bush election: It probably wouldn't matter... because if he found the power to allow him to have a third election... the nation would already be lost... but I'd still vote for someone else.

2007-10-10 07:50:39 · answer #6 · answered by pip 7 · 9 7

Why don't you write in Barbara. That way it will keep you from voting for some other moronic fringe candidate.

2007-10-10 07:54:22 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 3

NEVER. I agree with the Koolade remark but I had an answer knocked off for making the same reference to another question.

2007-10-10 08:00:24 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 6 3

Most definitely.

2007-10-10 17:57:11 · answer #9 · answered by Eric S 3 · 0 1

I didn't the first 2 times. Why would I vote for him now?

2007-10-10 07:56:57 · answer #10 · answered by labken1817 6 · 8 5

No, besides, since I didn't vote for him the other two times, it's a moot point.

2007-10-10 08:07:18 · answer #11 · answered by slykitty62 7 · 3 3

fedest.com, questions and answers