2007-10-10 07:32:29 · 31 answers · asked by TriSec 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
they are rolling in their crypts....
2007-10-10 07:34:38 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
that's over a 13 3 hundred and sixty 5 days era, and we've already spent lots greater effective than that on worldwide poverty. If the money is rather used to stay away from the deaths of 25,000 human beings ( worldwide extensive) who die daily from nutrition scarcity, then that's for a reliable reason. Too frequently, funds like that falls into the incorrect distant places arms. Hillary and Barack , blended, have spent a nil.5 billion funds on a 15 month marketing campaign that maintains to be lumbering on. we could desire to cut back back on marketing campaign time. cut back that to six months.
2016-12-14 13:27:37 · answer #2 · answered by burnham 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They'd probably tell Hillary to go help Betsy Ross and the'd probably tell Obama to go back out to the field. Our founding fathers had great vision, but they were by no means perfect. They were trapped by the values of their time whether they were right or wrong.
2007-10-10 07:40:44 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
They hanged Benedict Arnold so I think they'd feel the same about Hillary and Obama.
2007-10-10 08:17:41 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
honestly i think they would be far more mad about abortion,gay marriage,giving our jobs away,illegal immigration,poverty,unwed mothers,drug and alchol abuse,mental illness and the destruction of family and religion and so called political correctness!!!i think that is far more important than the sex or race of a political candidate.not to mention the war,social security,unemployment ,our national debt and also the corruption that is at every level of government and business!!! i feel Hillary and Obama will team up ,Hillary as president and Obama as her running mate as vice president!if so lets hope common sense and christian values and American pride and integrity will be their true platform and agenda!
2007-10-10 07:44:30 · answer #5 · answered by dixie58 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think the idea of a woman & someone of color running for office is what they had in mind for freedom & equal rights.
With that said however the current politics of the race & the direction of both parties would be of profound dissapointment I'm sure.
2007-10-10 07:39:40 · answer #6 · answered by Diamond24 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
They would say Hillary and Obama can run for president. It is THE RESPONSIBILITY of the people to choose who they want to lead and so be it.
2007-10-10 07:36:37 · answer #7 · answered by reaganite27 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Man, we did such a good job with this country's frame work that two types of people who we didn't even recognize as "men" in our time are able to now run for the highest office in the country. "cheers" (clinking glasses), told you this democracy thing would work great. It allows for the govt and times to change with the people.
(then they go back to grumbling about the british)
2007-10-10 07:36:26 · answer #8 · answered by Phil M 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
They would be surprised at the change in social consciousness that has happened in the last 200+ years.
2007-10-10 07:35:22 · answer #9 · answered by Sean 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Without the slightest doubt, most of our founding fathers would favor the democrats. Isn't that obvious?
Our founding fathers were liberals, thank Jesus we ignore the constitution.
2007-10-10 07:36:03 · answer #10 · answered by Earl Grey 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I am sure that they are rolling in their graves. Both Hillary and Obama are jokes. Those liberal fools have no chance at all in 2008.
2007-10-10 07:36:35 · answer #11 · answered by The Unconventional Desert Rat II 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋