I personally wouldnt name my child Elvis because I would think that they would never really own their name. People would always associate it with Elvis Presley.*
2007-10-10 06:02:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by Check this out! 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The name Elvis means, "all to wise".. I think the name Elvis is a great name.
There is also Elvis Costello.
If you named a child any name similar to someone who is famous or in the public eye, there will be a comparison but, both comparisons are great ones..
Good luck with everything.
2007-10-10 06:08:16
·
answer #2
·
answered by cameranhand 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Even if you were a really big fan, I wouldn't want to see a kid get that name, maybe as a middle name OK, but not everyone liked Elvis and the kid would be bothered by people asking him if he can sing or dance.
2007-10-10 06:06:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by Limestoner62 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would think if someone calls someone else Elvis its because they play music and maybe suck at it and they are being sarcastic by saying "Hey Elvis"\
No I would not name a kid Elvis, that one has already been taken.
2007-10-10 06:03:17
·
answer #4
·
answered by metallica_rocks0122 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I know a man named Elvis. I asked him how he felt about his name and he said that it was okay. Some people will joke around about it but he says that majority doesnt.
2007-10-10 06:03:13
·
answer #5
·
answered by Yuzuki 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have no idea. The only other "Elvis" I've ever heard of (besides Elvis Costello) was that alligator on Miami Vice.
2007-10-10 06:02:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by Resident Heretic 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, It is associated with Presley but I think the people who give their sons that name are fans already and want to honor him.
2007-10-10 06:02:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by RoVale 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
i do no longer why. i think of it particularly is especially with the aid of fact Elvis image way the undesirable-boy lover that every person wanted. Michael in no way expressed himself as a "undesirable-boy" and continuously stored a sparkling checklist for this reason what ever he does is going to be in its very own spotlight, that's the clarification why extra human beings pay interest to Michael and the fake effect than Elvis and genuine actuality. additionally specifically with the aid of fact Priscilla Presley in no way made her courting with Elvis a extensive subject like she became pressured into it, she confirmed activity in him and confirmed that she enjoyed him. no longer in basic terms like the little boy who claimed Michael had touched him, who made it a huge subject. the biggest reason that Michael is attacked extra is manly with the aid of fact he hasn't as quickly as stated "sure, I rapped him" or "sure, I touched him devoid of permission." there became no longer something to confess and via this Michael became continuously bothered continuously accompanied, Elvis made it well-known that he and Priscilla have been relationship and have been attracted to a minimum of one yet another for this reason he wasn't bothered as plenty approximately it. yet another key reason this became this sort of super subject is definitely racism. Michael Jackson is in all probability the main well-known African-American on earth and for this reason human beings % him to screw-up. they % him to be abusive, or to finally end up in detention center or to bypass "ghetto" on somebody, that's a tactic Obama has additionally found out of (observe how he in no way supplies a speedy reaction to the click question and that he continuously stops to think of it over.) Being that Michael has just about the cleanest checklist ever he's a universal aim. Michael is the superb entertainer, humanitarian and impact of the trendy-day which makes him a universal aim for the click who will continuously attempt to adhere a label on him. have faith me purely with the aid of fact he's ineffective does not advise the quest on MJ dirt is off. he would be attacked for as long as he would be remembered and that's a actuality.
2017-01-03 09:44:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by nail 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Its better than Adolf or Saddam, thats for sure
2007-10-10 06:39:51
·
answer #9
·
answered by Earl Grey 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
I sure wouldn't, I hate that name.
2007-10-10 06:04:24
·
answer #10
·
answered by BVRN 5
·
0⤊
0⤋