2007-10-10 05:47:40 · 11 answers · asked by alphabetsoup2 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
This is a totally objective question, I heard from a few devout fundamentalists last night saying it is a problem for them...
2007-10-10 05:48:33 · update #1
He will probably not get my vote in the primary, but if he gets the nomination I will vote for him.
2007-10-10 05:53:00 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
in case you think of that Romney won't carry his church doctrine into the White living house and set up it everywhere he in all probability can, considering the fact that's what they meant to from the day he replace into born right into a quite placed, properly padded faith. His dad worked heavily with Monson, the present president of the LDS. at the same time they groomed this guy to be the place he's, and to win in any respect expenses. Why? because of the fact they knew he'd become a good-looking fella with a enormously reliable head of hair? No. that they had their own schedule to push forward, no remember the cost or manipulation. And it ain't so as that they could legislate to have quiet time in Congress to study their e book of mormon thoughts. What might you think of of a particular denomination that envisioned to ultimately finally end up with finished worldwide domination of their own theist society? commencing with the united states of a? changes your finished attitude, would not it? Or are you only asking this question again and again for relaxing? all of us comprehend ONE faith IS coming that's no longer of God, with worldwide domination as its purpose.
2016-10-21 22:13:01 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Shouldn't be a problem I had to stomach voting for an evangelical.
But seriously I didn't give religion much thought when I voted for Bush -- what I was thinking was "no Gore, no Kerry"
The question you need to ask yourself is do you want 25+ years of Bush, Clinton, Bush, Clinton? Because it may come down to Clinton vs. Romney -- what are you willing to live with?
D
2007-10-10 06:28:42 · answer #3 · answered by Dionysus 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Okay I'm definitely not a Christian fundamentalist Republicans, but I had to answer.
I don't think it matters to the RRR that much as long as your a devout Christian.
Hey Joseph Smith had a "vision" that should be good enough for them.
2007-10-10 05:57:08 · answer #4 · answered by Global warming ain't cool 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
I'm an athiest and wouldn't vote for Romney because he reminds of the slick used car salesman who sold me a lemon.
He's got a great smile and an answer for everything. Whether or not that answer is the truth and/or is representative of what he truly believes in, is another issue.
2007-10-10 05:56:04 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
I would vote a Mormon over a Socialist so why would I not vote for a Mormon in the primary?
2007-10-10 06:06:45 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
If the choice comes down to a Mormon Republican or Hillary "I'm religious. Really. I am." Clinton, it's an easy vote for the Mormon.
2007-10-10 05:55:21 · answer #7 · answered by Philip McCrevice 7 · 4⤊ 3⤋
I am a Catholic, and yes, I can support him. I don't judge people based on their religion; only on their actions.
I am voting for Fred Thompson, though.
2007-10-10 05:54:55 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
I have recently heard the same thing from a friend.
2007-10-10 05:53:48 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
No. I am (as well as the rest) of the conservative Republicans are supporting Fred Thompson
2007-10-10 05:54:24 · answer #10 · answered by mustagme 7 · 1⤊ 5⤋