English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

This article came out some time ago in USA Today. It is a comprehensive survey of religious beliefs and political views in the U.S. The results were fascinating, and they proved what I have always thought. Who you think "Gawd" is determines your politics more than any other factor.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/religion/2006-09-11-religion-survey_x.htm

"Though 91.8% say they believe in God, a higher power or a cosmic force, they had four distinct views of God's personality and engagement in human affairs. These Four Gods — dubbed by researchers Authoritarian, Benevolent, Critical or Distant — tell more about people's social, moral and political views and personal piety than the familiar categories of Protestant/Catholic/Jew or even red state/blue state."

2007-10-10 04:33:36 · 3 answers · asked by Earl Grey 5 in Politics & Government Politics

3 answers

agreed

2007-10-10 04:40:25 · answer #1 · answered by Rana 7 · 1 0

this is affected my preliminary theory of abortion. whilst i became into youthful, i became into given a set of regulations. you realize, mendacity is undesirable, stealing is undesirable, killing is undesirable. although, there are issues that are no longer strictly top or incorrect. removing abortion does no longer mean each thing will fall into place. If we are to have self belief all existence is priceless, shouldn't that contain lives which have already been typical? i do no longer in uncomplicated terms like the theory 2 human beings had intercourse and are actually dealing with a potential individual who did no longer ask to be conceived, no longer to point aborted (this is purely one subject of many). I additionally do no longer in uncomplicated terms like the belief of forcing those human beings to bypass by 9 months of economic, actual, and hormonal rigidity. this is purely of the make certain(s). What relating to the conceived being? i'm no longer professional-abortion. i'm professional-selection. I lean heavily in the direction of bringing the fetus to term and making the in charge selection, yet i won't be able to deny the different selection. Witnessing 2 generations of youth father and mom with a low socio-economic status is undesirable. allowing 3 generations could in uncomplicated terms propose an added era of suffering. My faith has taught me no longer in uncomplicated terms to view the existence, yet in addition the welfare of that pronounced existence. i'm hoping there will be a time whilst an entire coaching relating to the human physique and incredibly intercourse could be made obtainable to all so as that whether human beings available purely would desire to have intercourse, they could habit themselves in a manner that would not even require abortion instead.

2016-10-08 23:17:32 · answer #2 · answered by loy 4 · 0 0

Very interesting and I guess not as surprising as it might seem. If our morals are formed by varying degrees by religion or lack thereof then it's not surprising that our societal beliefs would follow.........

2007-10-10 04:39:58 · answer #3 · answered by Brian 7 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers