2007-10-10 03:33:39 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
It was a bad decision making that made this a war. It is not a war now. They're not fighting armies anymore. In the first place there was no doomsday device that was discovered there. If the Americans are looking for a real war maybe they should pick on North Korea. They have weapons there and the Koreans are no chicken **** unlike the Iraqis.
2007-10-10 03:42:11 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
In Fall of 1990, Saddam invaded Kuwait. By November 1990, my firm had negotiated the successful withdrawal of Saddam's troops and the war could have ended even before a shot was fired! Not many people know of this, as this story was not published by the press (worldwide). We sent out over 800 press releases worldwide as to what our firm had done.
So, to answer your questions, (1) the Iraq War is illegal, criminal, and murderous. It was a bad war, which can be reversed. But in all honesty Congress, the President, and his administration do not want to do this! (2) It is a good thing to end this war in order to save human lives (especially with China, North Korea, Iran, Syria and other nation that are hostile to US interest waiting around the corner! And YES, it can be reversed to America's best interest once again! (3) Congress and the Executive Office, somehow, I most honestly say, don't want to deal with the reality of troop deaths, so they turn a blind eye to truth and continue on in their lies!
It is up to our media to reveal the real truth behind the Iraq War and force our government to recant!
People MUST put pressure on government, if they want to see an end to further killing, death, and war!
Also see:
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=ApdUgaGrvfayf3fKA4kvTQbQ7BR.;_ylv=3?qid=20071010040455AARcKOz
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20071010063552AAlBFOi&r=w
Thank you,
peace negotiator
Read the above links!
2007-10-10 04:39:51 · answer #2 · answered by peacenegotiator 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's not a war on terrorism as it has created more. Also, the war on terrorism should have continued in Afghanistan.
It's not a war to free people from a dictator because Saddam Hussein was overthrown early in the conflict. There are other dictators in the world so why stop there.
It's not a war because of WMD's because none were found despite sattelite photos to convince the UN of the case for war.
It's not a war for revenge for 9/11 because we did that in Afghanistan and Osama Bin Laden and Al Quaeda is still around.
Unfortunately, we cannot reverse it. There is no final goal for Iraq, and if it is to set up democracy in the Middle East that is something that the Iraqis need to fight for themselves.
2007-10-10 03:42:16 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
This question just pisses me off.
Iraq was war mongering at its best... We got it so we use it...
plain and simple... If Iraq was doing something so horendous where is the proof... None the WMDS???? None, Nada Go in there blow things up spend money then spend more to fix what we destroyed stupid stupid stupid. The rich getting richer because they have money in the contractors that go into the area after we leave.
What ever you call it it wasn't a war it was a mess and a waste of time money resources and our soldiers lives.
I do not disrespect the families that lost loved ones and I wish I could belive that their loss was for a good cause. But until the good old Government can tell its public what the hell we were doing there when Al Queda (who we were suppose to be going after)is on the other side of the map I really can't belive that.
2007-10-10 03:41:09 · answer #4 · answered by The_Schwarz 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
In the begginning it was a war. But with the collapse of Sddam's regime, we don't really have a defined enemy we are fighting. In that sense we won the war. What we have now is the worst kind of military action. A peace-Keeping force. And everybody in the world hates peacekeepers. If you go people die, you look cowardly and dishonorable, If you stay, thesame people will die, some of your guys die too, some of the enemies die, and you warmangering and stupid to cuntinue with iu.
2007-10-10 18:25:33 · answer #5 · answered by James L 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
War itself is a very bad thing and when you go on some ones land and start killing them and let those people kill our young solders,who are force to do that job,what kind of idea is this? definitely not a good one.
specially the reason we had to go for war was to kill the terrorists,and catch bin la din,find the weapon of mass destruction?what we achieved ?destruction,and waist of precious human life for both the side.a very bad idea to start a war and gain nothing.
2007-10-10 03:47:35 · answer #6 · answered by Feroze R 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
It's a War on Middle class Americans and our Tax $$$!
2007-10-10 03:44:43 · answer #7 · answered by MarkyMarkC 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Will you call it a bad idea the next time 3,000 innocent people get murdered? And don't give me the old "Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11". There are radical muslims all over the middle east who want us DEAD. At least this President doesn't choose POPULARITY over what is good for our protection.
2007-10-10 03:37:28 · answer #8 · answered by baby1 5 · 4⤊ 4⤋
I thought the war was against terrorists.
our war is "war on terror"
not to stem a larger civil war in other countries with weaker leaders.
2007-10-10 03:41:07 · answer #9 · answered by ktlove 4 · 1⤊ 3⤋
It was a good idea that ended up taking a heck of alot longer than we thought it would and costing more lives and is now a bad irreversible idea.
And Biggie is an idiot.
2007-10-10 03:38:00 · answer #10 · answered by Zeke 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋