I would save my children without a doubt. They are small and helpless. My spouse has a better chance of making it out on his own than them. Thats such a horrible thought :( Great question though.
2007-10-10 03:29:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by Sweet T 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would save all kids (3) and spouse before my own at risk of lossing mine, before I let anyone be consumed in a fire in a nut shell my life is more expendable before anyone in my families is
2007-10-10 03:33:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Save the child. Spouse is an adult and can presumably look after himself.
2007-10-10 03:25:39
·
answer #3
·
answered by * Xanthippe 6
·
5⤊
0⤋
properly, my companion is a large guy so I doubt i might have the skill to help him out in any way different than to yell at him to get out of the living house. If he have been incapacitated and could no longer circulate i do no longer think of i could desire to help him. He outweighs me by employing a hundred sixty five kilos!
2016-10-21 21:57:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
That's a hard choice, but I would have to save the kids.
2007-10-10 03:27:22
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, with my experience, the husband would save himself. I would save the child
2007-10-10 03:26:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
my child without question and I know my husband would grab the kids before me too
this is something we have talked about once actually and we agreed we would both expect and want the other to grab the kids first and foremost
2007-10-10 03:25:38
·
answer #7
·
answered by jambutty 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yeah, motherly instincts would probably kick in. Of course, I would do my best to save both.
2007-10-10 03:25:09
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
wow - I'd probably end up saving the kid
i hope i would never have to make a decision like that
2007-10-10 03:24:44
·
answer #9
·
answered by doo 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The children. Neither my spouse, nor I would have it no other way.
.
2007-10-10 03:28:56
·
answer #10
·
answered by Jacob W 7
·
0⤊
0⤋