2007-10-10 02:16:59 · 10 answers · asked by brad 1 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Biology
Yes! Finally, someone with an ounce of sense. When Darwin discovered Mendilean genetics, and began pioneering the first primitive paternity tests among avians, he began to question his faith in science and the gods of reason. In sunday school, the pastor told us all about it--the renuncation of science (and pigeon breeding), Darwin's baptism and being born again, and deathbed confessions of his youthful scheme to lead the whole world astray!
2007-10-12 14:55:57 · answer #1 · answered by Bonezilla 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Darwin didn't discover any DNA links my friend. DNA would still take a century to be discovered. To find a common ancestor for any bird and a human you'll have to go a long way back, between 200 and 300 million years I think.
I would rather be the offspring of a dodo than be a man and afraid to face the truth. (Free after Thomas Huxley)
2007-10-10 09:28:27 · answer #2 · answered by Steven Z 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
You are an ignorant uneducated person. Are you a Fundamentalist Christian?
And just WHEN did Darwin 'give up Science?
Darwin knew nothing about DNA - that was discovered by Crick-Watson decades later.
Totally anachronistic (something out of its proper place in Time)
2007-10-10 10:19:17 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 0⤋
Darwin was dead long before DNA was discovered.
2007-10-10 09:49:04 · answer #4 · answered by Runa 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
This person emails u with more weird sh--
don't even try to answer.
He may be the link between dumb and dumber
2007-10-10 09:26:11 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
I recommend no one answer questions from Brad. He will only email you privately with some more nonsense when you try to answer seriously.
2007-10-10 09:40:03 · answer #6 · answered by Joan H 6 · 9⤊ 0⤋
Your question is nonsense, containing entirely false and anachronistic statements.
2007-10-10 09:25:34 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 0⤋
Gee, you are wise.
Glad to see you have your history down.
That is sarcasm in case you didn't catch it. Cant be too sure with questions like that.
2007-10-10 11:47:42 · answer #8 · answered by Captain Algae 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
yeap, thats where he finished off,in the do-do
2007-10-10 09:28:39 · answer #9 · answered by THE"IS" 6 · 0⤊ 5⤋
lmfao.....
good one......
Darwin couldn't even discover the zipper on his pants......
2007-10-10 09:26:20 · answer #10 · answered by graciouswolfe 5 · 0⤊ 7⤋