Two months ago a lot of Republicans were going nuts for Fred Thompson.
And now, after bumbling in the debate last night, his star is falling and falling.
2007-10-10 02:02:55 · 16 answers · asked by Villain 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I can careless about the Republicans in case you want to know.
2007-10-10 02:09:47 · update #1
He's toast.
2007-10-10 02:07:27 · answer #1 · answered by Holy Cow! 7 · 2⤊ 5⤋
He bumbled? I admit the beginning of his first answer was awkward but after that he did pretty good for his first debate.
All and all I think it was a decent debate. Except for Ron Paul, does this man live on earth?
Still haven't made up my mind but we've still got over a year. Lots of time and debates before then.
Besides, it would seem you would have learned from making such wild predictions after the last several elections. I hope you weren't one of the many that had to rush to therapists after Kerry lost.
2007-10-10 09:25:39 · answer #2 · answered by time_wounds_all_heelz 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
He had a senior moment in the beginning of the debate, but recovered. His statements during the debate demonstrated a man that has but a shallow grasp of the issues, and, fell back on platitudes, and his delivery was awkward, at best.
2007-10-10 09:11:18 · answer #3 · answered by alphabetsoup2 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
There is not a single person running (on the top tier) who is worth a crap...doesn't this concern you???
Why single out the people who should be rejected anyways?
Which if any are going to repeal the patriot act, the domestic spying, the torturing? Not a God damn one that I have heard of.
You don't know shite!!!! **** YOU! you are a democratic ditto head ,just as much as there are ditto heads of the right wing variety.
2007-10-10 09:06:38 · answer #4 · answered by somber 3 · 6⤊ 1⤋
He is a sort of special setup to elect Hillary.
With such moron as a candidate she will win in a breeze.
What a disaster.
I've just recalled the same setup in Russian elections of 1996. Political technologists tested their ideas there to apply them here.
2007-10-10 09:10:11 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I cannot think of a gaffe.....but he certainly did not shine.
He, like everyone, teeters off after his announcement. What is also not discussed is how much others have teetered back as well. It is still an open primary.
2007-10-10 09:33:46 · answer #6 · answered by lundstroms2004 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
13 months from the election and already making predictions? That's just amazing. In the last cycle, at this time Howard Dean was far out in the lead, and then he crashed and burned like we expected him to do. I think it's way too early to call anything.
2007-10-10 09:08:27 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Again with the name calling. What is it about today's liberals?
Why have you stooped to this obscene violation of elementary standards of intellectual coherence and decency?
Please, there must be more to you than school yard name calling.
.
2007-10-10 09:15:44 · answer #8 · answered by Jacob W 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
"I can careless about the Republicans in case you want to know."
Then why ask a baiting question? and then follow it with a qualifying statement....
Futility or Trolling??
2007-10-10 09:18:35 · answer #9 · answered by Cookies Anyone? 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Thompson is just another Conservative Hack who preaches intolerance and elitism under the guise of being a "good American".
2007-10-10 09:28:04 · answer #10 · answered by Resurrected 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
He is just another Hollywood actor. The ones the cons accuse the liberal of adoring.
2007-10-10 09:13:57 · answer #11 · answered by Ohsassyone 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋