English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-10-10 01:37:47 · 12 answers · asked by Link strikes back 6 in Politics & Government Politics

Bryce,
I know answering is not obligatory.
If you would prefer using a website without there being any mention of English politics feel welcome to leave.

2007-10-10 01:44:36 · update #1

12 answers

Oh yes...the damage he'll cause will be astronomical. Just think, in his first 100 days we had floods, disease, war...it's almost Biblical. Can he not take a hint?

2007-10-10 01:56:51 · answer #1 · answered by slıɐuǝoʇ 6 · 2 0

It seems that you like posting questions but!!!
You do not like the answers that you receive from such a question. Why is that?
Why ask a question, knowing that you will get answers not favourable to your question?
If you do not like the answers, why post the question in the first place, numbskull?

You have a good go at "Bryce" only because "YOU" did not like the answer.
It seems that you should live with Mugabe in Zibabwe, you would love each other.
Don`t post questions if you are not prepared to accept the answers that are not in YOUR favour d1ckhead!

2007-10-10 07:10:53 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It is a terrible thought. We know the man is a traitor to Britain, a liar and a thief and now he has shown he is a gutless traitor, liar and thief.

Yesterdays Pre-Budget speech where Labour STOLE all the Tories suggestions, had his fingerprints all over it.

God save Britannia.

2007-10-10 02:45:45 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

For those who supported Tony Blair this is a poor analogy, but for those who opposed him there is a fitting and old Scottish saying "Tis better to deal with the devil you know rather than the one you don't know". Be careful who you throw under the bus!

2007-10-10 02:13:00 · answer #4 · answered by Barney 6 · 1 0

Yes.....
Did I vote for a Scotish Prime Minister.....NO.
Would I have voted for a Scottish Prime Minister....No.
The Scottish and Welsh both have their own assemblies and not an English man in site.....Why does England have to have a Scottish head of our Country...Forget British.......Both my mothers parents were Scottish, and my aunt who Emigrated to the USA when she married a USA service man back in the war....still describes herself as Scottish, not British....

2007-10-10 01:43:21 · answer #5 · answered by jude 6 · 2 0

Yes! Greatly displeased and concerned

2007-10-10 01:40:10 · answer #6 · answered by jamand 7 · 3 0

What country would that be?

Not to appear ignorant, but you DO know this board is truly international, don't you? You could be talking about any English-speaking country, from Great Britain to Canada to the USA, where we do speak a form of English.

2007-10-10 01:42:06 · answer #7 · answered by Bryce 7 · 0 3

Tough. Labour were democratically elected. If you didn't vote, you've no right to answer.
If you voted for another party, tough luck, your boys and girls lost.
Ha!

2007-10-10 07:12:01 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Yes - That is a terrible prospect.

2007-10-10 01:40:00 · answer #9 · answered by Robert W 5 · 3 0

Yes....me.

2007-10-10 01:44:19 · answer #10 · answered by ? 5 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers