LOL, come on Libs, be honest, now, and tell the truth! I've been waiting for the truth from y'all for simply YEARS!
2007-10-10 01:35:01 · 18 answers · asked by xenypoo 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Jacob W, I think you're BRILLIANT!
2007-10-10 01:57:15 · update #1
Wow! Have you ever seen so many people side step an issue in your life? The answer, of course would have to be GWB. Those on the left just cannot bring themselves to admit that Bill Clinton has no character or that there is anything at all redeeming about Bush.
This, my poor deluded lefties, is what intellectual dishonesty looks like. Please, reconsider your decision to back a party that constantly puts you in the uncomfortable position of having to defend the indefensible.
"Every man must be judged for what he is and treated accordingly . . . just as you do not pay a higher price for a rusty chunk of scrap than for a piece of shining metal, so you do not value a rotter above a hero . . . To withhold your contempt from men's vices is an act of moral counterfeiting, and to withhold your admiration from their virtues is an act of moral embezzlement." -Ayn Rand
.
2007-10-10 01:51:05 · answer #1 · answered by Jacob W 7 · 4⤊ 5⤋
i could elect Clinton over bush and right this is why. Clinton is purely liable for mendacity approximately getting a ******** from a GOP hooker. jointly as bush is busy stealing from us and those in Iraq, style of like what the nazi's did to the Jews and the Germans. even with the undeniable fact which you're probable purely as grasping and would't see. In answer on your factors of view: a million: bush's faith is so stable he had to develop right into a reborn christian to declare that status. 2: bush would not provide you the reality if his existence depended on it, he'd plead the 5th or on the grounds which you suspect so strongly he'd probable sell you a dried up oil nicely.. 3: definite he'd serve with as plenty hobby as he would desire to slot in his foreign places bills, he ducked out of the provider and wasn't even in a time of conflict, what a retard. If in uncomplicated terms something of our militia would desire to sellect the place they decide to serve i ask your self what proportion could be in Iraq. 4: nicely he would desire to care approximately his kin even with the undeniable fact that i'm sorry for his spouse, a guy who's in mattress via 9 leaving her to the strip golf equipment and stuffing money down youthful mens jocks won't be able to be all stable. nicely a minimum of all of us understand the place a number of our tax money are going besides and that i'm effective the stripers are happy of it. 5: he's this variety of stable chief and group participant that the GOP hates him and maximum of his voters besides even with the undeniable fact that there are some who purely won't be able to confess he's valueless.
2016-10-08 23:07:43 · answer #2 · answered by harren 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
George Bush is a man of moral principles. I do not believe our First Lady, Laura Bush would have any cause for doubt on her man's fidelity.
On the other hand which Clinton are you talking about?
We know Bill is a womanizer, is Hillary one too?
2007-10-10 01:55:56 · answer #3 · answered by Moody Red 6 · 4⤊ 2⤋
For Bert T : You never heard of 99% of the crap that Slick Willie got away with because your Liberal Socialist Bias` Media covered him like Monicas` dress ! So we understand your postion of " Not Knowing " and your Bias` knowledge is evidence that the Liberal Socialist Bias` Media `s underminding the truth is working very well !!!!
2007-10-10 04:49:41 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I can trust Bill Clinton to at least cheat with consenting adult females. You never heard of BILL tapping his foot in a public men's room. You never heard stories about BILL writing dirty emails to underage male co-workers, AND you never heard rumors about his alleged homosexual relationships in college.
I wouldn't trust George W Bush to bring me a cup of coffee without it costing several hundred thousand dollars takes 10 times as long to bring as it should and when it DOES finally get there, it's oatmeal.
Can you please explain to me how ANYONE can trust Bush after his lies about Saddam Hussein's "nuculer" program?
2007-10-10 01:44:48 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 4⤋
My instincts have always told me to stay clear of slithering men like Clinton. He's the type who would probably end up bragging about his body parts in the middle of our first dinner date.
Bush walks upright, has that traditional brand of Texas charm and respect for women and would probably initiate some great conversations over dinner.
Bush hands down.
2007-10-10 01:44:29 · answer #6 · answered by wider scope 7 · 5⤊ 5⤋
If I was a wine bottle George Bush
If I was a deep throat Bill Clinton.
But I'm not .
Take care
2007-10-10 01:42:46 · answer #7 · answered by Sorry deleted 4 · 4⤊ 4⤋
If I was married to Bush (so help me god) I WOULD be the one cheating, probably with Mitt Romney.
2007-10-10 01:57:17 · answer #8 · answered by Global warming ain't cool 6 · 3⤊ 3⤋
It doesn't matter really, except that infidelities while in office, are foolish given our era's media lust to break BIG stories...
I totally would trust Clinton on policy matters, George W. has proven a disaster.
2007-10-10 01:38:45 · answer #9 · answered by alphabetsoup2 5 · 7⤊ 5⤋
Neither. Men who crave power like they do have huge appetites for EVERYTHING, including sex.
EDIT: But really, what does this have to do with politics?
2007-10-10 01:38:51 · answer #10 · answered by slykitty62 7 · 3⤊ 4⤋