given that socialism has failed miserably anytime and everywhere it has been tried, do you think that it will work here? do you think hillary can do socialism better than say, the europeans? how about the canadians? or how about south america?...those countries under socialist rule suck as does much of the rest of the world. why would you want that for us?
2007-10-10 01:11:24 · 15 answers · asked by darwinman 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
capnbill, if all that were actually true, then why aren't you living in one of those better countries?
seems to me, it is you who are living the "high life"...lol
2007-10-10 04:26:05 · update #1
victor, if you can point to even ONE example of your , or anyone else's, civil liberties being infringed upon, i will vote to impeach bush...but you can't and you know it.
2007-10-10 04:27:35 · update #2
meg obviously shills for hillary...but meg, those countries are NOT doing fine, live under 65 - 80% taxation rates depending on how much they need to give to the worthless from their own and other countries who come to live off the backs of thers, no incentive to create, when was the last time a new and great thing came from a socilist country meg?...i'll wait...
i checked the facts, meg, and the facts are on MY side, not yours...
2007-10-10 15:42:01 · update #3
It is one thing that bothers me. Really disgusted with alot of my fellow citizens.
2007-10-10 02:48:39 · answer #1 · answered by archkarat 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Most industrial nations in the world have national health care (socialize medicine) and they are doing just fine. The US no longer has the highest GDP per capita, and we are running an enormous trade deficit, and the dollar is falling in value vs the currencies of the nations that you think suck including Canada. I think you should check your facts about how other countries are doing especially the Scandinavia's ones. Our best economy since the 60's were when Hilary's husband was president. Here is a web site where you can find statistics on the economic performance of countries so your future attacks on Hilary can be based on correct factual information,
http://www.nationmaster.com/cat/eco-economy
2007-10-10 03:54:21 · answer #2 · answered by meg 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
whilst the U. S. fractures, there will be incredibly some alternatives, a number of that are glaring no-bypass's. there will be the country of "Fwank" (my spell examine pronounced "W-ank", how proper) Taxachussets, D.C, (which has continually been this is very own united states of america) Western Pennsylvania (would not contain Philly) Upstate long island, (would not contain city of the comparable call) and the infamous united states of america of "Flyover", which will probable be the biggest, yet lacks political course. there is often Californication, which has dissimilar factors yet lacks backbone, yet has an added bone specially cities in its southern aspects. i'd desire to bypass on, yet you are able to nicely think of the "balkanization" going on your self. i could say concentration on Northern aspects west of the Mississippi, yet even which would be slipping away.
2016-10-08 23:06:32 · answer #3 · answered by harren 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It bothers me that we are going down the road that so many other successful societies have gone. Success and prosperity seems to bring laziness and greed in later generations. People have lived such easy lives in this country now they want more without doing the work. I am not sure how they think this will work but they do.
2007-10-10 01:23:52 · answer #4 · answered by Bob J 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
You are basing your 'poll' on what you think will happen is Hillary becomes president. You have no basis to assume that. A more accurate question would be do you think America has become more fascist under the Bush regime? At least with that question we have the actual history of the last 6 years.
2007-10-10 01:41:41 · answer #5 · answered by ndmagicman 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Only the Republicans can prevent the USA from moving toward socialism. Do not vote for Hillary or Obama. Vote for Giuliani or Romney.
2007-10-10 01:28:46 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋
The truth is that America (nor any other country) has never been a purely capitalistic society. That would be anarachy.
2007-10-10 01:18:25 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
When you run the world, a little socialist nation is needed to prove the point.
2007-10-10 01:19:11 · answer #8 · answered by Ellen 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
No, but it does bother me that the Constitution has been virtually ignored. That civil liberates have become the thing of the past.
2007-10-10 01:30:46 · answer #9 · answered by White Star 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Poll questions should be unbiased. How about a poll that says "Does it bother you that the US is involved in a pre-emptive war entered into with little planning and no strategy for success?"
Rick B. Do I know you? Obviously you do not know me and have not read any other answers I have given.
2007-10-10 01:18:22 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 5⤋