Apperently she made a comment and it included a foul word. The comment was about the principle. I do not believe he or the school should have any right to give her any punishment for her opinions she put on her site. There is no way they would get away with doing that to my kid.
2007-10-10 00:42:07 · 14 answers · asked by ? 7 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
I think that it is a LOAD~there are freedom of speech laws, and I think that even though there was also a comment regarding a teacher, that they still have that right as long as they are not slandering the person. That is the gift of being an American!!!!
2007-10-10 00:52:14 · answer #1 · answered by Austins Mom 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Personally, I think it is unfair because OUTSIDE of school she should be able to diss the prinny all she wants! The words 'her site' are also in favour of her. It is after all her own site, a little area of the cyberworld to scream out what ever random thoughts. How the principle found out is irrelevant as he/she should know that the moment he/she clicked the link to your daughter's site meant that she could be in control of what ever she wanted to say - getting away with it because it is within her site. If a person has a problem with it they can just leave.
Blab ... sorry I'm just a pissed off High Schooler :)
2007-10-10 00:54:11 · answer #2 · answered by youmemomo 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think it's got something to do with the 'cyber policy.' this girl made up some crazy story about me bullying her online, and she took it to the counselor (who's a complete b***h) and then she said that I broke the 'cyber policy.' The principle called me up one day and gave me a whole lecture about being 'safe' on the internet. I almost got suspended. They wanted to check my email, so I let them, but then they couldn't find any proof. I didn't do it, so there couldn't possibly be any proof, but they thought that I deleted the emails with the 'problems.' It was so unfair. Now that same girl's spreading rumours, lies, etc. about me. Luckily, no one takes her seriously....But still, it hurts.
So in my opinion, I think that if she didn't do it, it would be unfair, but since she did....But suspension is a bit harsh. Maybe a lecture would have been better.
2007-10-10 00:49:57 · answer #3 · answered by jasmine 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The lines start to get a little blurry when it comes to MySpace pages and FaceBook...I agree with it if it fell in the category of libel or slander--but only by the legal definition. Otherwise, it really is none of the school's business unless she is using their computers to post the material. It's getting stupid out there...in a world where they try to convict a 5 year old of sexual harrassment (hugging the teacher) and 10 year olds for participating in "butt slapping" day. It's getting to the point where we are no longer a democracy...the littlest of things we do and say are being mandated.
2007-10-10 01:54:50 · answer #4 · answered by Smooch The Pooch 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
nicely tbh, it doesnt remember the place the remark became into made, as quickly as you published it onto the internet, this remark became into made obtainable to absolutely everyone who would desire to view the positioning. asserting something like that would reason a hell of dissimilar problem and you're fortunate you in uncomplicated terms have been given suspended. What could have occurred if the instructor have been given fired to your remark? this is not any longer something greater advantageous than cyber bullying, which you would be able to get arrested for. So definite the remark became into made public and brought about offence on your instructor then you incredibly would desire to have been suspended!
2016-10-08 23:06:03 · answer #5 · answered by harren 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you are going to say things in public, you gotta expect some reactions. A student (in or outside) of the classroom still represents his or her school.
Yes, teachers do check out what is said on line. That's part of what has to be done to protect children remember Columbine. I figure if you don't say it in school you shouldn't post it either.
2007-10-10 01:18:21 · answer #6 · answered by metoo 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That is so not right. What is the difference of them listening in on a conversation between her and a friend that wouldn't be right either someone should fight that one.
2007-10-10 00:50:43 · answer #7 · answered by Cowgirl lost seahorse 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It makes me think that I am as happy as can be that when I went to school the internet was "too new" and we didnt have to worry about such things.
2007-10-10 00:47:08 · answer #8 · answered by Metemucil Mama 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
that is wrong on so many levels, what a child does on their off time is no business to the school and I would get an attorney involved...
2007-10-10 02:02:28 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
If that was the case I would be suspended for the rest of time.
2007-10-10 00:46:58 · answer #10 · answered by LOL 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋