None of the above, it's because he is an idiot. Anyone can see that, why can't you?
2007-10-10 01:24:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Actually I have never called the President of the United States an "idiot". "Idiot" is a medical diagnosis, meaning anyone who has a developmental problem, and who cannot develop past the mental abilities of a two year old. When IQ was thought to be the be-a;ll, end-all of measuring Intelligence, someone with an IQ of 20-30 was considered an "Idiot".
However, I do believe Bush is working under diminished mental capacity. He has consistently shown himself to be a below average student, one who does not take his obligations seriously (such as the military obligation he still hasn't satisfactorily completed) and one who mangles the English language almost as much as, well, as you do.
I HAVE called the Chief Executive "Deserter", "War Monger" and "Liar", but never "idiot".
Then you mention Democrats are trying to get the "illegal alien vote".Look, this is just dumb and you do your party a great disservice by continuing to regurgitate the stupidity Limbaugh spouts everyday. ILLEGALS DON'T VOTE. You have to show valid ID and a place of residence to vote. Why would they risk capture and deportation, just to vote? I'm willing to bet YOU don't take the time to vote yourself.
FELONS don't vote either. But a Republican in Yahoo Answers asked whether or not the GOP should ALLOW Felons to vote, since they are now allowed in the military, due to lowered standards. Every Dem who answered the question spoke very forcefully about NOT giving convicts the right to vote again.
Take a couple hours off from your clumsy propaganda and READ some things.
But be careful, you might learn something.
2007-10-10 01:31:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
But to the contrary, he was NOT elected. The 2000 election was derailed in FL by GOP goons and President Jr was coronated by 5 Republican Supreme Court Justices.
In 2004, this election was rigged by Ken Blackwell in OH and Diebold. Beyond that Bush is an idiot in the classic definition of the term. Beyond that he is a corporate war mongering fascist.
2007-10-10 01:33:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
I haven't agreed with quite a few Presidents in my 60 years, but I never thought any of them were stupid.
In fact its hard to agree with any president in all the decisions he makes.
What Bush is, is incompetent. You can be smart and still be incompetent at something, and hes incompetent to be running a country he put to war. Hes incompetent to be filling positions of importance with his equally incompetent friends. Remember Heckuva Job Brownie? His previous experience was with horse shows. They all bring in their own, but Bush doesn't seem to have anyone who knows what they are doing, or he only likes people who are going to agree with him, and I'm sorry but that is the mark of an intellectually incurious person.
I have come to hate what hes done to my country, run it into debt, while cutting taxes on the rich, his unfunded mandates that have actually increased my taxes, his embarrassing speeches and gaffes. the divisiveness hes caused.
He is not a good president.
This is a good country.
It will be again.
2007-10-10 01:25:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by justa 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
this is the way I see it. bear in mind as quickly as we had the optimum prove ever interior the history of yankee elections in 2004, to do away with "W"? you will possibly have a be a retard on crack, in case you will possibly think of that, that many human beings voted just to maintain "W" "in" workplace, precise? human beings in common terms come at the same time like that, to kick a "Traitor" out of workplace! properly, how curiously now, is that McCain, is yet another Bush, because of the fact McCain, is a conflict puppet. With the Black container Deibold vote casting machines, yet another Florida,or Ohio, or the two, and the the remainder of "Their", grimy tricks, McCain does not could desire to "win", the election to be president. All that's mandatory is for them to "say", he won the election, Get it? It worked for Bush, two times!
2016-12-14 13:03:30
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
He was handed the 1st election, by a 5/4 vote by the Supreme court...that's not winning!!! That's theft.
That election was stolen by the Supreme Court by a plurality of just one vote. The "democratic process" within the United States, then, was subverted as a-half million more votes for Gore were subjugated to just one more vote for Bush. The improprieties of the Bush administration and the Republicans in the 2004 election have consolidated the theft of both elections in the minds of many millions of voters. Millions in the United States, including this writer, no longer believe that federal elections, and perhaps, all elections, can be conducted in a fair and impartial manner. We see that elections are being bought and stolen by those who possess the capital and power to buy and steal them. Elections are won through lying, cheating, deceit, disinformation, character assassination, gerrymandering, stuffing the ballot box, letting the dead vote, and denying qualified people the right to vote. Both Democrats and Republicans can be thusly accused, but the Bush administration and the neo-conservatives have raised the impropriety to both a science and an art-form. They have institutionalized deceit by incorporating it into their business plan.
P.S. You and people like you really need to stop calling the TRUTH ..hate.
2007-10-10 00:34:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
3⤋
You could really debate your position better if you learned proper grammar and sentence structure. Judging from your writing, you are either a child or just very uneducated. If you're a child, you are probably just repeating things you've heard your parents say. If you are uneducated, you can't begin to understand the issues you are bringing up. As much as I hate ad hominem arguments, I hate it worse when people expect to be taken seriously when they cant even communicate properly.
2007-10-10 00:55:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by bluecollaraddict 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
I call bush an IDIOT because it's true.
allowed 9/11 to take place
usama still free
quagmire in iraq
shall I go on?
And why aren't you in iraq fighting?
2007-10-12 00:02:34
·
answer #8
·
answered by chickenhawkbushbots 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
George Bush is running the military in to the ground. He spends money like a liberal. He doesn't protect the border. He doesn't protect the nation. He started a war that he can't or won't win. He doesn't protect border patrol agents or men in the military. He tried to flood the country with third world trash. He doesn't stand up to sanctuary cities. He can't speak well. He lets dictators use our country as a platform to spew their garbage.
He may have won the election twice (and I'm glad he did) but he's still a horrible president.
2007-10-10 00:43:13
·
answer #9
·
answered by qwert 7
·
5⤊
3⤋
Have you listened to his speeches? Or even his interviews? Not to mention his failed policies after failed policies. The guy is a mental midget with no concept of history, a distorted sense of morality, no respect for the Constitution, and he is simple a whore to corporate America.
2007-10-10 01:33:07
·
answer #10
·
answered by ndmagicman 7
·
3⤊
0⤋